Quite right. So will you rightwingnuts quit referring to right-center Obama as “leftist,” “socialist,” “Marxist,” or “Democrat,” none of which he gives good evidence of being?
“Obama was definitely not a “well-known quantity” when he was elected either time. His quantity and quality were ignored by the voters.”.Somewhat true. A few things that contributed to his 2nd term:.1. The scaring of women: ad after ad and liberal columnist after liberal columnist telling women that a Romney win would end abortion, completely ignoring history and logic. If Ronald Reagan didn’t do it, no Republican can..2. Purchasing of votes: Obama significantly increased the role of those on public assistance and those are Democratic votes bought and paid for by everyone. I work in a predominantly minority neighborhood and there were billboards for food stamps, something I’ve never seen in my 46 years of life..3. The incompetence of the Romney campaign. “Binders of Women”, 46% (or whatever that number was), being interviewed by known hostile press etc. They would have run a much better campaign running decisions by one of those magic 8 balls. A collective group of morons..4. The tea party and religious conservatives: took the focus away from Obama’s incompetence on the economy (where it should have been) and pushed non issues to the forefront: abortion (which the democrats and their allies wisely took advantage of) and gay marriage (that opposition to has no biblical foundation since it is an issue for “Cesar”.
“ad after ad and liberal columnist after liberal columnist telling women that a Romney win would end abortion, completely ignoring history and logic. If Ronald Reagan didn’t do it, no Republican can.”
-Yeah, in states where Republicans are in power, there has been no attack on abortion rights. None whatsoever.-Them liberal columnists got that one all wrong. Fer sure.
Motivemagus almost 11 years ago
Quite right. So will you rightwingnuts quit referring to right-center Obama as “leftist,” “socialist,” “Marxist,” or “Democrat,” none of which he gives good evidence of being?
echoraven almost 11 years ago
“Obama was definitely not a “well-known quantity” when he was elected either time. His quantity and quality were ignored by the voters.”.Somewhat true. A few things that contributed to his 2nd term:.1. The scaring of women: ad after ad and liberal columnist after liberal columnist telling women that a Romney win would end abortion, completely ignoring history and logic. If Ronald Reagan didn’t do it, no Republican can..2. Purchasing of votes: Obama significantly increased the role of those on public assistance and those are Democratic votes bought and paid for by everyone. I work in a predominantly minority neighborhood and there were billboards for food stamps, something I’ve never seen in my 46 years of life..3. The incompetence of the Romney campaign. “Binders of Women”, 46% (or whatever that number was), being interviewed by known hostile press etc. They would have run a much better campaign running decisions by one of those magic 8 balls. A collective group of morons..4. The tea party and religious conservatives: took the focus away from Obama’s incompetence on the economy (where it should have been) and pushed non issues to the forefront: abortion (which the democrats and their allies wisely took advantage of) and gay marriage (that opposition to has no biblical foundation since it is an issue for “Cesar”.
braindead Premium Member almost 11 years ago
-Yeah, in states where Republicans are in power, there has been no attack on abortion rights. None whatsoever.-Them liberal columnists got that one all wrong. Fer sure.