Actually right on in my opinion. Bush started it. Obama ran with it. Both sides are at fault.
Now we’ll have the typical dialouge from the Kool Aide drinkers on both sides where all they want to talk about is why it’s the other sides fault and not their own. Because blame is what’s important and not fixing the problem.
Bush IGNORED the FISA courts, at least Obama is using them. I don’t like the direction this right-wing approach is heading, but folks should consider the source, not just whose applying what he was handed.
I am now presumed guilty. With the amount of laws today, it is impossible to stay “legal”, therefore my government may surveil me. I am no longer secure.
The US Constitution, 4th Amendment (1791)The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
larryrhoades almost 11 years ago
An ugly cartoon.
warjoski Premium Member almost 11 years ago
Actually right on in my opinion. Bush started it. Obama ran with it. Both sides are at fault.
Now we’ll have the typical dialouge from the Kool Aide drinkers on both sides where all they want to talk about is why it’s the other sides fault and not their own. Because blame is what’s important and not fixing the problem.
Dtroutma almost 11 years ago
Bush IGNORED the FISA courts, at least Obama is using them. I don’t like the direction this right-wing approach is heading, but folks should consider the source, not just whose applying what he was handed.
donotemailme almost 11 years ago
I am now presumed guilty. With the amount of laws today, it is impossible to stay “legal”, therefore my government may surveil me. I am no longer secure.
The US Constitution, 4th Amendment (1791)The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Michael Peterson Premium Member almost 11 years ago
And this is SUCH a change from when the Republicans were in charge!