Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for May 29, 2013

  1. 11 06 126
    Varnes  almost 11 years ago

    My greatest fear has been realized….Wiley is the only sane one among us….(Nobody saw me or heard me say that, right…?) Truth is dangerous in the future…I’ve read books….

     •  Reply
  2. Picture 22
    jack fairbanks  almost 11 years ago

    play your new song, or show ‘em your cute kitty video; they’ll leave

     •  Reply
  3. 654px red eyed tree frog   litoria chloris edit1
    Superfrog  almost 11 years ago

    Confidentiality is sacred but privacy is for sale.

     •  Reply
  4. 1682106 inline inline 2 mel brooks master
    Can't Sleep  almost 11 years ago

    Privacy on the Internet is just like in the real world: your passport has stamps showing where you’ve been, and the Internet has it’s own records of where you go – of course, you go a lot more places on the Internet, including ones you don’t want anyone to see! (And your mail isn’t private.)

     •  Reply
  5. Ytinav
    jreckard  almost 11 years ago

    internet privacy = oxymoron

     •  Reply
  6. Stormdrainnodump
    pelican47  almost 11 years ago

    I’d like to see a regulation on sold or shared mail lists (snail mail, e-mail, phone, and any other) that gives the recipient the right to know: Where did you get my address?

    I’d call it the Trail of Information Act.

    Perhaps every piece of unsolicited mail or call should be required to identify the source that shared the address. This would include religious and political items as well as commercial.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    emptc12  almost 11 years ago

    We’ll adjust, I’m sure. If you believe such things, we ignore the constant and thorough purview of God and the guardian angels with the threat of much worse consequences.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Beleck3  almost 11 years ago

    privacy, what a quaint notion.

     •  Reply
  9. Ngc891 rs 580x527
    alan.gurka  almost 11 years ago

    Looks like another #$% reality show, and those are the judges in the other room.

     •  Reply
  10. Packrat
    Packratjohn Premium Member almost 11 years ago

    My resolution for spam? I know, you didn’t ask… Charge the originator one cent per email when sent in bulk. If it’s legit, they won’t mind paying. If it’s spam/scam/junk, they’ll stop.Still working out the details, but I like the idea.

     •  Reply
  11. Me 2015
    puddlesplatt  almost 11 years ago

    a camera in the toilet bowl

     •  Reply
  12. Willy wonka factory
    dsom8  almost 11 years ago

    And here we sit, posting our thoughts for any number of perfect strangers to read, and complaining about lack of PRIVACY?! Oh my, the irony is so thick I can’t see anything else.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    daveoverpar  almost 11 years ago

    Or Eric Holder privacy?

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    dabugger  almost 11 years ago

    Danae is missing……

     •  Reply
  15. Foggie
    yimhere  almost 11 years ago

    Life has become a Psych 101 experiment – and we’re the “volunteer” lab rats!

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    sarah413 Premium Member almost 11 years ago

    I Always Feel Like Somebodies Watching ME. M. Jackson

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Defective Premium Member almost 11 years ago

    What I find disturbing is, not the lack of privacy (which is bad, but…), but the attitude from so many that it doesn’t matter. And I’ve found that younger people are more likely to hold this belief, because they’ve been brain washed for basically their entire lives. Anyone that grew up before the internet gained popularity usually feels different, but not always. This means that in another decade or two, most people will expect and be ok with the invasion and expect it.We as individuals don’t matter, though, so it’s ok. We’re all just sheep to be bought and sold.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    wrwallaceii  almost 11 years ago

    Privacy? Huh, with about seven billion people in the world and maybe around two billion on the Internet who is going to be able to watch every single person? Who is going to watch the watchers? How are ‘they’ going to be able to sort out who, what, where and when? It sounds like Information overload. Lots of data and to many ways of interpreting it.

    In the last ‘Bourne’ movie the NSA was having difficulty tracking Bourne and the reporter through the train terminal. Try that on a world wide scale. Just keep your head down, don’t look into any cameras, and wear a hat with a wide brim to make it harder.

     •  Reply
  19. 20141103 115559
    Potrzebie  almost 11 years ago

    Imagine doing AA sessions via skype!!!

     •  Reply
  20. Bgfcvvesve4ipojsr
    Gokie5  almost 11 years ago

    Gads, didn’t realize I had three comments in a row! Sorry . . .

     •  Reply
  21. Lonelemming
    Ernest Lemmingway  almost 11 years ago

    That’s the problem with the Internet. Order something using your credit card, BAM! You’re in about a thousand systems. It doesn’t much help that sociopathic media is so big; the rise in identity theft, stalkers, and even serial killers alongside the rise of sociopathic media is no coincidence. I’m not exaggerating, either. Never have such felons had it so good. And don’t think you can stop them by pulling down a sociopathic media page. Once your name, picture, credit card number, SSN, basically anything given online—even over encrypted channels—it’s out there for good. All it takes is a little know-how to uncover anything and everything. It’s scary!

     •  Reply
  22. 1175703 628288277203175 166978261 n
    Caddy57  almost 11 years ago

    Privacy is what you make of it…..case in point ….JB….screams about how he wants privacy then does every stupid stunt known to humanity to draw the media to him…..or was that LiLo? I can never keep the two idiots straight!

     •  Reply
  23. 11 06 126
    Varnes  almost 11 years ago

    bopard, Both points well taken….

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur