Steve Breen for October 11, 2009

  1. Missing large
    kennethcwarren64  over 14 years ago

    He may have won it because he wasn’t Bush, but by not being Bush he has brought a little more peace to the world.

    Let’s not forget the past 8 years in which everyone who didn’t totally agree with what we did, or had a question was labeled “a friend of the terrorist!”

    Also give him credit for being more then a little embarassed by the whole thing.

    Bush would have accepted it, and Republicans would have crowed about it.

     •  Reply
  2. Image013
    believecommonsense  over 14 years ago

    Yes! and for reasons why I believe this is so apt see my post on Nick Anderson 10/11/09

    which also helps begin to explain the reasons why closing Guantanomo is so difficult and the reasons why the international community feared for the USA for eight long years.

     •  Reply
  3. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 14 years ago

    Oh, give it a rest, everyone. Sheesh. If he turned it down, the GOP would gleefully stomp on him for “admitting” he didn’t deserve it, and what would happen? The Nobel Committee would give it to the second-place winner? Nonsense. All that would happen is that he would be registered as the guy who won the Nobel and didn’t pick it up.

     •  Reply
  4. Image013
    believecommonsense  over 14 years ago

    heck, motive, I don’t want him to turn it down! I’m just saying i get the “not-Bush” reason from an international perspective.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    kennethcwarren64  over 14 years ago

    You have to give the Republicans credit, they have turned a non-issue into an issue, so we spend time on this instead of the important things like health care, and the wars.

    The Republicans keep saying NO and attacking because it works, and no one asks them why they haven’t done anything except say NO and attack.

     •  Reply
  6. Wombat wideweb  470x276 0
    4uk4ata  over 14 years ago

    By and large, church, it was the conservatives who made the bigger noise about it, at least from what I have seen (feel free to prove me wrong). Liberals probably snickered and made jokes, but not as much.

     •  Reply
  7. Image013
    believecommonsense  over 14 years ago

    no, i think liberals have acknowledged he was given the award not for accomplishments but for the promise of accomplishments to come. And, it seems, for not continuing the cowboy ways of prior presidents. So i don’t what church is whining about.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Magnaut  over 14 years ago

    KW…and the peace is where? although he has cut our economy to pieces

     •  Reply
  9. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 14 years ago

    No, everyone – including Obama – thinks it came too soon, though he made some important steps that put him light-years away from his predecessor’s approach to international relations. The Nobel committee said it was to encourage steps, and as several other cartoons have noted, it will now be staring at him at night… I’m just tired of hearing about it. Can’t we discuss a few other issues, please?

     •  Reply
  10. Reagan ears
    d_legendary1  over 14 years ago

    Sour grapes.

     •  Reply
  11. Willow
    nomad2112  over 14 years ago

    Bush - not Bush, yep, that’s all they got.

     •  Reply
  12. Image013
    believecommonsense  over 14 years ago

    church: I am “whining”. yes, you are.

    (oh shat, I broke my vow never to respond to church. never mind)

     •  Reply
  13. V kanela 2
    YANGO  over 14 years ago

    Tambien tienen el derecho a equivocarse.No será la primera ni la última,pero si la mas notoria y polémica.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Steve Breen