Matt Wuerker for February 14, 2013

  1. Masked
    Rickapolis  about 11 years ago

    To the GOP, the word bipartisan means giving them everything they want and getting nothing in return, Which, by the bye, is why they lost the election. Except for the far right extremists everyone is catching on. Angry white men are on the way out. It’s the 21st century. Time to join us.

     •  Reply
  2. Caddy
    StCleve72  about 11 years ago

    Groucho sings the Republican response to the S of the U: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtMV44yoXZ0

     •  Reply
  3. Wally 2
    adherent#1  about 11 years ago

    He left out curing cancer and walking on water…something for next year?

     •  Reply
  4. United federation
    corzak  about 11 years ago

    “Be bipartisan? Are you kidding? Obama tried that for four years, enough already!”You’re absolutely correct. The rest of the world is moving and changing. The US has a lot of work to do stay in the game.The Republican party has made it very clear that they want no part in governing. Want no part in investing in the future. Fine. Let them go off to Glennbeckville and argue among themselves about birth control, protecting white male sensitivities, black panthers in Benghazi or whatever.The rest of us have a lot of work to do.

     •  Reply
  5. Jollyroger
    pirate227  about 11 years ago

    You reap what you sow, Dumb(o).

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    SABRSteve  about 11 years ago

    What’s so fanatic about a group of folks who are alarmed at a National Debt of $16.5 trillion, $58.2 trillion in Total Debt, and $122.7 trillion in US Unfunded Liabilities? I’m not a Tea Party person, but I do get what they are concerned about.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    paytonb  about 11 years ago

    Obama was never bipartisan in any way shape or form. Why do so many list to the right and left wing mouthpieces and completely ignore what’s actually going on in front of them??

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    paytonb  about 11 years ago

    The world is about compromise Eryx. Anyone who thinks they have all the answers is usually the one with the least. Nobody “wants” to compromise on things they feel are right but without it nobody gets anywhere. It’s really as simple as this. Two people are rowing a boat, one thinks they should row in synchronization while the other feels alternating is best. Both methods have their pros and cons but if they choose not to compromise they get nowhere. By compromising and switching from one method to the other neither gets it exactly the way they believe it should be but at least they make it to the other side of the river. Why is this concept so hard for people to understand?

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    SABRSteve  about 11 years ago

    We’ve added 6 or so trillion to the debt since obama came into office, what did we get for our money? We should have started with infrastructure.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    thebaldtexican  about 11 years ago

    one instance of O being bipartisan? crickets…

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    paytonb  about 11 years ago

    Rebuilt the economy?? You can’t be serious..

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    paytonb  about 11 years ago

    You responded saying it means nothing then pretty much repeat exactly what I said in a summary. If there is no compromise, there is no progress period. It absolutely means something, in fact it means everything.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Matt Wuerker