Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for November 12, 2012

  1. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 11 years ago

    Seriously, all that money…and yes we are talking about real money….Seems like it was spent for nothing. Didn’t see that one coming. They got No Thing….I actually thought you could buy the presidency….God it’s fun to be wrong….

     •  Reply
  2. Photo  1
    thirdguy  over 11 years ago

    Varnes, you may be missing Wiley’s point here, they did buy the presidency.

     •  Reply
  3. Robby
    V-Beast  over 11 years ago

    Either way, more booze.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    dkendraf  over 11 years ago

    This explains a LOT. Andy Rooney said once, “A writer’s job is to tell the truth.” He could have been talking about cartoonists. Truth in jesting, yes?

     •  Reply
  5. Little bucky
    Blossoming  over 11 years ago

    @Varnes Honestly, I’d thought the same thing… Still in shock myself… :P… I really had my money on the money… LOL… Still in shock… (You mean you can’t overtake by force?… What’s with this country these days?…)… Bwahaha!… It totally repositions my perspective on reality… I’m shifting, I’m shifting, agh!!!!!!!…… (Global meltdown…)… (I know, I know what the comic means, I’m just saying, I never got to get that out of me… Sigh…)… Stuck in there like a stick stuck between a lion’s molar, it was…

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    mrbribery  over 11 years ago

    the pre-election victory party WAS better… although the pre-convention victory parties were good too…

     •  Reply
  7. Little bucky
    Blossoming  over 11 years ago

    Hmm… @Wiley I believe their may be an unknown purpose for the money that gets collected (one not just being used to line politician’s pockets…)… That’s just my theory, them doing it doesn’t make it right, either way!… (Oh, great Utopia,… why can’t you exist on this planet?…)… Btw, I love your comics, they just make me happy! :D…

     •  Reply
  8. Zoso1
    Arianne  over 11 years ago

    We understand the power of the POTUS and the SCOTUS, but what a privilege to witness the power of the VOTUS!!!

     •  Reply
  9. Ellie 3 n
    trspence  over 11 years ago

    A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing, however it did pump billions of dollars around the economy, putting food on the tables and paying the rents of thousands of families. So what it was all ultimately meaningless? In 200 years or less, this entire era will be as relevant as a forgotten fart from an insignificant frog on a scummy beach, by a polluted stream.

     •  Reply
  10. Avatar 3
    pcolli  over 11 years ago

    I think it was Masterskrain.

     •  Reply
  11. Nebulous100
    Nebulous Premium Member over 11 years ago

    It’s the Hedge Fund Investors that bet both ways.Investors like Trump are upset because they couldn’t buy the Presidency.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    elbeck  over 11 years ago

    Thees guys know all about hedge funding: No matter who wins or loses, corporations cannot lose at all. There’s a reason why we refer to politicians as Republicrats.

     •  Reply
  13. 406451 351945148156930 205407996143980 1362960 1949745235 n 1
    thebigh1973  over 11 years ago

    The GREATEST ever!!!!

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Reppr Premium Member over 11 years ago

    According to Freakonomics, money spent on elections is wasted as it has little effect on the outcome.

     •  Reply
  15. Cheryl 149 3
    Justice22  over 11 years ago

    I was once told by an elected official that if I wanted to be heard by a politician, I should contribute at least $5 to each candidate regardless of their politics. It gets you on their donor rolls, the first thing they look at when they get a letter.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    catzilla23  over 11 years ago

    Corporations pay to both sides for two reasons: 1. It’s a bribe to keep government from harassing them (see Microsoft). 2. It’s a bribe to let them do as they please regardless of laws (see Goldman-Sachs).

     •  Reply
  17. Pirate63
    Linguist  over 11 years ago

    That’s why they called it a “hedge” fund. They’re hedging their bets. Ask any good bookie. You want an equal number of punters on both sides of the bet. The bookie makes his money on the " vigorish" – the charge for making the bet ie. $6 paid for every $5 bet.I will now crack open a bottle of OBAN, single malt scotch, in celebration !

     •  Reply
  18. 061
    pawpawbear  over 11 years ago

    Taliban poppy sale.>>I have often pondered why the coalition forces didn’t just wipe out said fields and bring in seeds for food crops. Their country would be far better off with a good agricultural base. Then I remember the old conspiracy theory about the CIA being responsible for most of the drug trade in the USA. And elsewhere, also. If ther CIA got rid of a prime supplier they couldn’t keep us oppressed nor could they afford to keep many of their black ops going. I don’t know that I fully believe this but it is food for thought.

     •  Reply
  19. V  9
    freeholder1  over 11 years ago

    Local warlords get the money. talk to them about who they fund. And it isn’t both sides.

     •  Reply
  20. 420686 10201171188191447 913820625 n 5
    meowlin  over 11 years ago

    Whether the money was spent on the winners or the losers, it was still spent.

     •  Reply
  21. V  9
    freeholder1  over 11 years ago

    And the one who funded six Repubs lost every one. America actially wasn’t bought.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    dflak  over 11 years ago

    ’Tis true. If you bet on every horse in the race you are bound to pick a winner. You just bet more on the horses that are more likely to win.

     •  Reply
  23. V  9
    freeholder1  over 11 years ago

    wiley, I am SOOO surprised that we can talk pols here. : ) We know who most of the rich backed and we know why. he would have let them ship every buck overseas and build every item on the shelf in another country with no financial reprisals. The same philosophy that crashed us would have finished us. We dodged that bullet. meanwhile, his supporters act like spoiled children and whine about not getting their way. Then wonder why no one listened during the campaign. They predicted landslides and merely got the staus quo with a President who may get to realign the Court. Keep on doing the dems job for them, kids.

     •  Reply
  24. 03 head in universe
    Vonne Anton  over 11 years ago

    The Corp(se)orations win either way. Plus, they keep the populace evenly divided so there could not be sufficient support for any mass uprising, thus preserving their position of power.

     •  Reply
  25. Foggie
    yimhere  over 11 years ago

    But it’s still a clown show……..

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    ramonesfan  over 11 years ago

    All of you commenters should flood your congressmen and senators with emails and calls. Demand that they begin debating an amendment to the Constitution prohibiting the shenanigans allowed in the Citizens United vs. FEC decision. Then pray that Scalia, Alito, and Roberts retire or die off soon ….

     •  Reply
  27. Pogo
    Buggerlugs  over 11 years ago

    The good news is that all that money has gone into circulation here in the US, rather than just sitting in some Swiss or Cayman Island bank.

     •  Reply
  28. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 11 years ago

    freeholder, great point about the Supreme Court. I sleep better at night, now. It’s importance can never be over emphasized…..The court is all the marbles. I don’t know why it isn’t talked about more in the campaigns….A lot of people, women, African Americans, immigrants, Gays, really dodged a bullet this time…..

     •  Reply
  29. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 11 years ago

    Oh, and good one Arianne..

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    prrdh  over 11 years ago

    Funding by paying protection money, that is.

     •  Reply
  31. Zoso1
    Arianne  over 11 years ago

    jerry6665 and Varnes – Thanks, but really, Good one VOTUS! (Voters of the United States)

     •  Reply
  32. Viking
    steelersneo  over 11 years ago

    YES, FINALLY SOMEONE WHO SEES IT AS I SEE IT. Thanks Wiley.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur