These DNA results confirm what we suspected. There is only a 1-in-5 billion chance that you did not commit the foul.
That’s a pretty slim chance.
A
Two shots.
You don’t need DNA to call this foul on the Lakers’ Derek Fisher.
—
Jor-El He shoud have been a football player. He’d make a great lead blocker. I wouldn’t want to give him a hockey stick though.
Football & Hockey players wear pads. Pads could hurt his game. I suggest Rugby.
My initial thought of this comic was that the referee would need to go check the video replay. Then I scrolled through the comments and there it was, the video replay. Great job Jor-El
Get the stretcher.
Is DNA testing the next step after video replaying in this “get it right” progression?? What’s next?
well, if it was O.J.’s jury , then somebody else must have fouled him…..
if it doesn’t fit , you must acquit
Nighthawks - Concur! Well said!
GROG Premium Member over 14 years ago
That’s a pretty slim chance.
A
johnnydoc5 over 14 years ago
Two shots.
shinyd53 over 14 years ago
You don’t need DNA to call this foul on the Lakers’ Derek Fisher.
—
GROG Premium Member over 14 years ago
Jor-El He shoud have been a football player. He’d make a great lead blocker. I wouldn’t want to give him a hockey stick though.
pamlicorat over 14 years ago
Football & Hockey players wear pads. Pads could hurt his game. I suggest Rugby.
Meek1960 over 14 years ago
My initial thought of this comic was that the referee would need to go check the video replay. Then I scrolled through the comments and there it was, the video replay. Great job Jor-El
fredbuhl over 14 years ago
Get the stretcher.
rw1h over 14 years ago
Is DNA testing the next step after video replaying in this “get it right” progression?? What’s next?
Nighthawks Premium Member over 14 years ago
well, if it was O.J.’s jury , then somebody else must have fouled him…..
if it doesn’t fit , you must acquit
A
treBsdrawkcaB over 14 years ago
Nighthawks - Concur! Well said!