You ain’t no lady.
Haven’t heard of any Transgender flashers. Usually, married or living with their mom straight guys.
So according to the story, this really Puritan Christian woman took her daughter to a clothing-optional spa in L A and then complained about a transgender person in the locker room after the fact that no one could find. Yeah, her story doesn’t smell fishy or like a setup AT ALL.
When one believes perception is reality, insanity is the inevitable result.
The “incident” was a hoax. But 2 people did end up getting stabbed because of the lies. Bok should remove this.
Rainbow’s next “normalization” = pedophiles
Baghdad Bok falls for another hoax.
Just an illustration of where Bok focuses his mental powers….
What is the point? That all transgenders should be blamed for a singular incident? Until all Christians are punished for abortions doctors who have been killed or attacked by Christians opposing abortions, just be quiet.
Oh Chip. You sure know how to stir up shit! Yes. All mammals have only two genders. Penises over here, vaginas over there! Women have a right to privacy.
Republicans, Bok, and all his little troll friends ignore life-or-death issues to reassure us all that tЯц☠p / Jesus loves you, and shares your visceral hatred of homosexuals, BLM, Democrats, “Liberals”, Clinton, “The Blacks”, Biden, messkins, Pelosi, etc.
I don’t know if this is a portrayal of and accident actual event (and if it is, is what actually happened) or if it is a false claim. There is one link posted above (rather poorly), but that is for Fox. I have investigated many Fox stories and found the VAST majority to be totally wrong, often by their intent, so:
An important thing to remember is that there is a ploy, obviously well known to Bok, that, if there is a group you don’t like, find one member doing something bad and claim that this person is an example of the entire group, even when they are the only one who is doing something wrong. Conversely, to defend a group, even when they are mostly doing wrong, find one person who is acting properly and claim that that is the standard for the group.
There is a reason you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth in a court of law. You need all three conditions to determine what actually happened, and Bok very rarely, if ever, meets those conditions.
Multiple links (including FOCKS) with search argument wi spa exposure …
Chip, ever read anything, other than your extremist crap?
There is increasing doubt among law enforcement and staff at the Wi Spa whether there was ever was a transgender person there to begin with. Anonymous sources within the LAPD tell the Blade they have been unable to find any corroborating evidence that there was a transgender person present on that day.
Similarly, a source at the Spa told the Blade there’s no record of any of its usual transgender clients on its appointments guest list on the day in question. Treatment at the Spa is by appointment only, and most of its transgender clients are well known to the staff. https://www.losangelesblade.com/2021/07/07/alleged-trans-incident-at-upscale-la-spa-may-have-been-staged/
Mom has a mustache.
I grow weary of explaining the simple concept of providing a source to you. This was his opening sentence:
“*So according to the story,* this really Puritan Christian woman took her daughter to a clothing-optional spa in L A and then complained about a transgender person in the locker room after the fact that no one could find.” (emphasis added).
Nowhere in there is his opinion, despite your stubborn refusal to recognize simple English. I asked him to provide his source [for the story]. It isn’t very complicated.
“If you ask for a link, you’ll only get a link to one story with one viewpoint of it.”
I want to see the source of the viewpoint he expressed so that I can evaluate it for myself.
“Do something as simple as the search I mentioned and get several stories with multiple viewpoints so you can make up your own mind.”
As stated earlier, in very simple terms, it is the writer’s responsibility to provide his source for the benefit of the reader. At that point, he can evaluate it, form his own opinion, and if needed, find his own sources to either confirm or refute the source. Your baffling inability to grasp this elementary concept makes me wonder if you ever in your life wrote a term paper (and if you did, whether or not you received a passing grade).
“You seem to think “scholarship” only has one viewpoint.”
I have no idea how you reached that conclusion, as I never made any statement of the sort. In fact, I originally posted one word: “Source?”
If you’ve ever read any sort of scholarly article, historical book, or other academic work, you will note that the writers include footnotes or endnotes, bibliographies, and a list of works cited, for the exact reasons I’ve been trying to explain to you.
You seem to be one of those people who disagrees simply for disagreement’s sake. Again, I grow weary. If you can’t grasp the concept of scholarly citation after this post, I give up, because, frankly, it’s not worth trying to educate the willfully ignorant