Advertisement
Advertisement

Chip Bok for April 06, 2013

  1. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  over 8 years ago

    Clearly, Chip knows nothing about guns.

     •  Reply
  2. Giraffe cat
    I Play One On TV  over 8 years ago

    Let’s assume that you have access to every type of weapon available, and can afford a wonderful supply.

    Now let’s assume that the government decides to overthrow the will of the people.

    We’ve been spending hundreds of billions per year for decades building our armed forces.

    Tell me how you expect to beat the government with your supply of weapons. And while you’re at it, tell us how you will avoid being flattened while you’re gathering your ammo.

    Do you REALLY think anyone or group of anyones (other than the military itself) would be able to overthrow our government by force?

    If so, please tell me your thinking as to how this could be accomplished.

     •  Reply
  3. Cthulhu p1xg
    gorbag  over 8 years ago

    @ScottPM: Let’s allow liberals to have words in the constitution evolve then. “Taxes” can mean when someone gives you gum. “President” can mean a dead fish. “Supreme court” can mean where one has basketball playoffs.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Don Winchester Premium Member over 8 years ago

    What’s it like in your world of make-believe?

     •  Reply
  5. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 8 years ago

    My wife scared off someone with a cutlass. This is an idiotic cartoon.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    ConserveGov  over 8 years ago

    Wait a minute. If we banned semi-automatic weapons, how the hell would that burglar have one?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    brent Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Right…cause statistics show that home defense with semiautomatic weapons is so effective and happens all the time. Poor fearful fools.

     •  Reply
  8. Images
    Mickey 13 Premium Member over 8 years ago

    All this rhetoric is great, but gun control legislation has pretty much been declared DOA in congress.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    Don Winchester Premium Member over 8 years ago

    BWAAAA-HAAA-HAAAAA (GASSSSSPPP), AH-HA-HA-HA-HAAAAAAA!!!!! Whew, that was a good one…your superiority…..(snicker)……

     •  Reply
  10. Durak
    Durak Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Ridiculous.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Quipss  over 8 years ago

    Most robbers are cowards, pulling out a gun however adds something into the mix and means that somebody will most likely die be it the robber or the individual, once a gun is pointed at you there is no longer the flight option, thus leading to confrontation. As a result you get a higher murder rate if the robber shoots, or a higher self defense death rate, assuming the victim shoots first.

    I personally disagree with “guns keep government in check”. Plenty of african & asian governments can disagree. Generally guns can be used in a bloody coup that establishes an authoritarian rule.

    Violence is the alternative to democracy that leads to great pain, best possibility is a power vacuum is created, this can be kept open alike somalia with continued violence. Or will be filled with whomever has the most organized military power.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    woodwork  over 8 years ago

    did you know that knives of a certain length are illegal to carry?Why shouldn’t AUTOMATIC weapons be illegal also?

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Don Winchester Premium Member over 8 years ago

    And, if you had had a gun and a lacrosse stick to choose from….you woulda had ALL the time to ponder the situation, taken a few minutes to see if your life were in danger, and if it was, still chosen the lacrosse stick?

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Don Winchester Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Proved what point? That you Libs see yourselves as superior? That you are ignorant of the fact that you are is what makes you and him the joke.

     •  Reply
  15. U joes mint logo rs 192x204
    Uncle Joe Premium Member over 8 years ago

    “As to the armed forces, just the admission that we would be defenseless against them means that the government already has too much power.”

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    SueMcP  over 8 years ago

    oh please…. how ridiculous!

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Meiskey  over 8 years ago

    AMEN!

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    Don Winchester Premium Member over 8 years ago

    I’d pity you, but it’d both be lost on you, and wasted.

     •  Reply
  19. 200
    Michael Peterson Premium Member over 8 years ago

    I thought it was only the anti-gun people who didn’t know the difference between “automatic” and “semiautomatic.” And, um, muzzleloader.

    ’Cause, you know, if the DID ban semiautomatics, well, it takes at least 10 minutes to cock a gun. Yeah, Chip.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    wongmama  over 8 years ago

    City boys amaze me—my father could kill anything he ever needed to with a single-shot .22 rifle.

     •  Reply
  21. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 8 years ago

    The toon depicts what was on the market in 1791, so what’s the problem with it?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Chip Bok

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement