Candorville by Darrin Bell for July 06, 2022

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  3 months ago

    New proposal: if enough states agree — let’s say 75% — a state or states can be expelled from the Union.

     •  Reply
  2. Sponge
    nadie1943  3 months ago

    And the Dems wanted to make Cali into 5 states.

     •  Reply
  3. Albino turtle 2
    boydpercy Premium Member 3 months ago

    Holy mangled quotation! That’s why we have to pay tackses.

     •  Reply
  4. Img 20211208 115937
    David Huie Green-BeingCertainIsNotAlwaysBeingRight  3 months ago

    They did secede. Then you conquered them and forced them back in because you wanted them. All’s well that ends well.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    PraiseofFolly  3 months ago

    Parody of ”Deep in the Heart of Texas”

    The IRS can cause distress / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    They will pursue till what is due / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    Is paid in full and then might toll / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    A penalty they will decree / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    You might cry foul but they will growl / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    To resist this fee’s futility / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    You’ll waste your breath and flirt with death / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    That cliche phrase might end your days / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    An epitaphic and pithy graphic / Deep in its claim of Taxes

    Upon your ‘stone, your corpse now prone / Deep due to defying Taxes

    Writ: “Sure is Tax and Death, As Wise Men Saith” /

    Deep ‘neath the crush of Taxes.

     •  Reply
  6. Screenshot 20190317 213710 chrome
    twstd  3 months ago

    Taxes?! not if you have an offshore account, a good accountant and a good lawyer.

     •  Reply
  7. Braveheart
    Free or Not? Premium Member 3 months ago

    Well, the Civil war did NOT settle whether states can secede. The civil war made sure that the states that stayed in the Union did not have slavery. It was enforced militarily, States can obviously still secede. The states formed the union and can leave the union. Enough states could get together and dissolve the country by forming new unions.

    The federal government did not create the states. The states created the federal government.

    California has been talking a lot about secession. I vote yes for that! Any state that wants to secede should do so. As long as the people agree.

    Now, that said, it would be better to keep our union together, as long as it defends the individual rights of persons and does not continue to grow into the oppressive technocracy run by elitists. Let’s see if we can reverse the collectivism and return to the Constitutional republic founded in 1791 through our constitution after our nation was created in 1776.

     •  Reply
  8. Fb img 1509486198333
    e.groves  3 months ago

    If Texas leaves it will be one less red state to content with.

     •  Reply
  9. 7553c0eb fe60 48a8 a4b6 2f89cdbcf5ac
    RonnieAThompson Premium Member 3 months ago

    The Dude Abides: the Gospel According to the Coen Brothers

    https://www.amazon.com/Dude-Abides-Gospel-According-Brothers/dp/0310292468/ref=nodl_?dplnkId=03e967ac-9697-40d2-aef8-190d6ba576e7

     •  Reply
  10. Avatar
    Ed The Red Premium Member 3 months ago

    Let Texas go. Like most Republican-leaning states, it takes more money from the U.S. government than it pays in taxes. Everyone remaining in the U.S. would be better off.

    https://www.moneygeek.com/living/states-most-reliant-federal-government/

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    blah_duh  3 months ago

    Or as one of my high school teachers had a sign on his wall, “The only things that are certain in life are: death, taxes and no credit for late homework”

     •  Reply
  12. Bob 1
    moondog42 Premium Member 3 months ago

    When I was a kid in Texas, lots of people talked about secession. It’s a thing Texas has a lot of, and it’s something which has grown more under republicans, because the republican worldview is that it’s easier to start and lose another civil war than to change themselves for the betterment of society.

     •  Reply
  13. Olympus 004
    John9 Premium Member 3 months ago

    Death and Taxes are not a good combination either. MIL died in August and I had to file her final return for 2021 by mail because she died and IRS doesn’t allow e-filing. So the delays from 2020 taxes are still there and I am still waiting for the paperwork to be processed and it may be another year before it is done.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    jconnors3954  3 months ago

    Heard the tax base thing before. Don’t care. Urban California has no respect for rural California.

     •  Reply
  15. Ball 3001 reasonably small
    kauri44  3 months ago

    I’m guessing Clyde has never paid taxes.

     •  Reply
  16. Img 1754  2
    GiantShetlandPony  3 months ago

    Let them, remove and destroy all the military bases and federal buildings. Build a big wall (this is a wall I could back) around Texas and let them fend for themselves. Good bye, good riddance, don’t come asking us for money after your next hurricane, drought (which is laughable as most of the state is effectively a desert, so duh) or energy crisis. Show us just how independent you can live without all the unearned federal money that Texas receives.

    Good luck with your King Abbott and court jester Ted Cruz.

     •  Reply
  17. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member 3 months ago

    From the Wikipedia article “Texas divisionism”:

    Article IV, Section 3, of the United States Constitution expressly prohibits any other state from dividing up and forming smaller states without congressional approval. The relevant section states “New states may be admitted by the Congress into this union; but no new states shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as of the Congress.”

    The Joint Resolution for Annexing Texas to the United States, approved by Congress on March 1, 1845, states: “Third – New States of convenient size not exceeding four in number, in addition to said State of Texas and having sufficient population, may, hereafter by the consent of said State, be formed out of the territory thereof, which shall be entitled to admission under the provisions of the Federal Constitution; and such states as may be formed out of the territory lying south of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes north latitude, commonly known as the Missouri Compromise Line, shall be admitted into the Union, with or without slavery, as the people of each State, asking admission shall desire; and in such State or States as shall be formed out of said territory, north of said Missouri Compromise Line, slavery, or involuntary servitude (except for crime) shall be prohibited.”

    No such provision exists for any other state.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    Arghhgarrr Premium Member 3 months ago

    With the supreme court stuck on nonsensical originalism and insisting that congress either pass laws or amend the constitution, both of which it is unable to do, the result will be the states passing their own laws on key areas such as guns, abortion, climate change, etc…. This will lead to two Americas with the western and northern coastal states eventually entering into a coalition and the southern and middle states forming their own group with perhaps only national defense still run by Washington DC. I give it ten years before we see the first serious steps towards disunion.

     •  Reply
  19. Grim reaper beads1
    William Bludworth Premium Member 3 months ago

    I say let Texas secede. Then when the drug cartels in Mexico decide to reclaim Texas, let’s see how well the Texas National Guard does without the assistance of those dang Yankee Blue Coats.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    LNER4472 Premium Member 3 months ago

    No less a leftist “tract” than “The Book of Lists” and “The People’s Almanac” listed Texas as among the “Places Most Likely to Secede” in its 1970s compilations of facts, trivia, and wanton speculation, brought to you by the same mindset that brought you Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States.”

    Texas was listed, based on its oil production and differing political leanings. In addition, Wallace/Wallace/Wallechinsky pointed out the “right to subdivide into up to five states” (denied by others here) and noted the appeal of additional Congressional representation.

    It should be noted what areas made up the rest of that list. As I recall, the #1 “place” on the late 1970s “secession” list was a joint entry for Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Various other future “breakaway” Soviet republics were listed, as were Bosnia-Herzegovina, Scotland (which did recently hold an independence referendum in a national election!), Wales, Quebec, and of course Texas.

     •  Reply
  21. Toughcat
    bakana  3 months ago

    Clyde has never worried about Taxes. He just doesn’t Pay them.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Candorville