Advertisement

Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson for February 18, 1991

18 Comments

Hide All Comments
  1. Missing large
    cockatrice_hunter  about 11 years ago

    @greekhoplite, Shouldn’t all countries know… virtually all wars are for nothing

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    cockatrice_hunter  about 11 years ago

    @greekhoplite, Shouldn’t all countries know… virtually all wars are for nothing

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    master_tananh  almost 11 years ago

    @Charlie

    sigh… the point of the strip isn’t questioning what wars have “accomplished.” It questions why killing each other is considered an acceptable way to solve problems instead of, say, negotiation, compromise, etc.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Hevil93  almost 11 years ago

    My b-day strip ;_;

     •  Reply
  5. Rebemci
    Summersnow  over 10 years ago

    @Charlie_Bucket

    I didn’t realize that WW2 was suddenly American history… And Hitlers goal was never to rule the world, first off he was reuniting old Prussia and all German speaking countries like Otto von Bismarck did and then he started the holocaust (Which was his real goal). His view of the world was that there is a master race (Aryans) and he wanted to “save Europe” from the “invading easterners” hence his conquest to kill the Jews but not only them, he also killed gypsies and handicapt people (for being geneticly inferior).

    Long story short, he had a faulty view on life which has been proved by genetics (Blond hair and blue eyes are recessive genes) and he would never have been able to take over the world with only the German army and I’m pretty sure Hitler also realized that.

    Have your facts straight before you make an argument. But yes I agree with you that some wars are justified, like against slavery and all that. But I also think that diplomacy should come first and that does not make you a hippie Charlie. If a non violent solution is available that should be the first course of action.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    bemis269  about 10 years ago

    @master_tananh

    unfortunately, there will always be people in this world that are not reasonable, and do not want to negotiate or compromise – Hitler being a prime example of that. This makes killing them acceptable. Not pleasant but necessary.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    prettychainsaw  over 9 years ago

    As for american history, the only one you got right was independence. We didn’t have a civil war about freeing the slaves, we had a civil war about state rights, we didn’t enter ww2 to stop hitler and save the jews, we entered ww2 for revenge (publically). Wars aren’t fought between good and evil, they’re fought between opposing viewpoints, and the winner gets to put whatever spin on it they want. If we had lost our war for independance, It’d be a civil war, not a revolution, if we had lost the civil war (the north) it would have been a revolutionary war for the south. If we had lost WW2, I don’t know what we would have called it, but we’d be having this conversation in either german or japanesse

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Mark Thames  almost 8 years ago

    …How did we start talking about this?

     •  Reply
  9. Fej1
    maxbacsi  over 5 years ago

    “…grown-ups just ACT like they know what they’re doing”? Was this a question anytime?

     •  Reply
  10. 090722 eclipse space 02
    yow4zip Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Very deep.

     •  Reply
  11. Ad7f33cb aace 440a b69b a3f818a37b97
    BobTheDuck9999  about 2 years ago

    Calvin is wiser then we think.

     •  Reply
  12. Aaue7mbu7bfb5h4fi mjzdvelzvy7ayjshwx5wplz5mp
    rklynch  12 months ago

    Calvin, I don’t think any adult can come up with an answer to that question…

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    tylerhagenbaugh13  10 months ago

    As a super early Sunday strip described, war is just a stupid game with no winners.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Calvin and Hobbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement