Brevity by Dan Thompson for January 23, 2014

  1. Julia napping
    Allen Rymer  over 8 years ago

    Yeah, but things even out in the end

     •  Reply
  2. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 8 years ago

    Anybody see those two? Who were they again? 69?

     •  Reply
  3. A service i need
    Kvasir42 Premium Member over 8 years ago

    They seem prime to me. (Comments are still loading, so I am pretty sure I am not the first to post this.)

     •  Reply
  4. Ytinav
    jreckard  over 8 years ago

    It takes two to ten go.

     •  Reply
  5. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member over 8 years ago

    The group were planning to see an r-rated movie, cos they’re all eighteen.

    6 and 2 just ate together…. Now that three and seven left them, they’re minus two.

    Oh well… gossiping is a good after-dinner “game” ….any number can play.

     •  Reply
  6. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member over 8 years ago

    2 and 3 don’t get along…. they were all at six’s and seven’s.

     •  Reply
  7. Image
    Olddog1  over 8 years ago

    So, that’s where number six went.

     •  Reply
  8. P1030429
    Jonni  over 8 years ago

    Only a real square number would talk like that about a radical.

     •  Reply
  9. Frog4
    Digital Frog  over 8 years ago

    So is 6 expecting or just over 8?

     •  Reply
  10. Img 0813
    GoodQuestion Premium Member over 8 years ago

    I guess seeing 7 and 3 together made her 2 10s . . . ☻

     •  Reply
  11. Confused1
    Flatlander, purveyor of fine covfefe  over 8 years ago

    so everyone missed the prime part? 6 is the only non-prime there.

     •  Reply
  12. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  over 8 years ago

    Only a fraction of the possible puns have seen their days numbered so far……..

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    DocArtie  over 8 years ago

    I think 7’s gonna get lucky. 3’s got some nice curves.

     •  Reply
  14. Stressedout
    Erwin Schwartz Premium Member over 8 years ago

    As couples go. . . I’d say they’re a perfect “10”!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Brevity