B.C. by Mastroianni and Hart for October 27, 2016

  1. Missing large
    xiaruili  about 5 years ago

    Nope…didn’t need to look that up. That’s an old school evolutionist excuse. What they invented when it was obvious that their billions of years narrative was a fail.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    stamps  about 5 years ago

    Maybe he could go as a colon.

     •  Reply
  3. Large tv test pattern  color
    Lyons Group, Inc.  about 5 years ago

    After what their ancestor did to Eve in the Garden of Eden, there no chance of any snake having legs ever again…

     •  Reply
  4. Avatar1
    Chithing Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Phyletic gradualism makes more sense to me, but what the heck do I know…

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    David Wolfson Premium Member about 5 years ago

    How is she turning the pages???

     •  Reply
  6. Erroll for ror
    celeconecca Premium Member about 5 years ago

    it is too early in the morning (for me) to decipher words with so many prefixes. And, as this is probably something that has not yet, and probably will never, come up in a conversation it’s to early in my life to do more than realize it’s a concept that exists. Thank heavens for Wikipedia, huh?

     •  Reply
  7. Roflmao
    What? Me worried ?  about 5 years ago

    OOOOH Big words hurt !

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Claire Jordan  about 5 years ago

    Punctuated equilibrium is more likely to be correct, because all living things (except maybe archaea) have a genetic buffering mechanism whih means that minor mutations often are only expressed in times of great stress. This means that when there’s an environmental change, mutations which were already present but hiden are suddenly expressed, increasing the species’ range of options for dealing with the stress by increasing the number of different forms.

    If, however, you live somethwere where the climate is changing constantly but slowly – such as a river delta which is silting up – then you’ll get gradualism.

     •  Reply
  9. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  about 5 years ago

    I saw this and had to hit them by tossing a pinch of salt over my shoulder. This sped things up.

     •  Reply
  10. Avatar
    neverenoughgold  about 5 years ago

    Okay, okay, most of you know I don’t like cats; but just for the record, I’m not fond of snakes either…

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Albertaguy  about 5 years ago

    Both gradualism and punctuated equilibrium are valid and and not mutually exclusive.

     •  Reply
  12. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member about 5 years ago

    It doesn’t matter he says, the fat chick is still going to clobber him.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    jbruins84341  about 5 years ago

    Snakes got families?

     •  Reply
  14. Music   circle of fifths
    JastMe  about 5 years ago

    Back around 1980 I read a recent article about the punctuated equilibria theory to my biology students. They didn’t believe it was real, because as one put it, “That says that every once in awhile one animal has another animal for a baby.” Another student added “What are the odds that another animal has the same ‘other’ animal at the same time, close enough that the new animals can start a new species.” I pointed out that there were nearly 200 of the top scientists from the various fields of biology that had changed Gould’s Hopeful Monster theory into Punctuated Equilibrium. So it was scientific. They disagreed.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    LeeMost Premium Member about 5 years ago

    Yes, I had to look it up, and was pleasantly surprised to discover whole concepts about details of evolutionary theory that I had never thought about before. I told my wife and daughter about it, and neither of them had heard of either this or gradualism before. That led to a discussion of the ideas, and a posting on Facebook, which led to more discussions. I love it when a comic strip can lead to greater education!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From B.C.