Working Daze by John Zakour and Scott Roberts

Working Daze

Recommended

Comments (43) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. BlackKnight15

    BlackKnight15 said, 4 months ago

    haven’t seen it. Sorry Roy.

  2. Paul Smith

    Paul Smith said, 4 months ago

    I won’t see it, sorry Roy.

  3. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, 4 months ago

    The Book or movie? Since I´m honestly not going to waste time on the movie either.

  4. herdleader1953

    herdleader1953 said, 4 months ago

    The movie was good. Really enjoyed it and will buy it when it comes out on DVD. Looking forward to the next two episodes.

  5. simpsonfan2

    simpsonfan2 said, 4 months ago

    Long yes. Boring, hardly.

  6. Sportymonk

    Sportymonk said, 4 months ago

    The book was much better, (usually is). The trolls and dwarfs in my minds eye were much more fierce than any movie could ever be.

  7. Leo Autodidact

    Leo Autodidact said, 4 months ago

    @Sportymonk

    That’s always the way . . .

    I’ve often used the metaphor of a Mountain when explaining how a “Good” Movie of a book works. You see the Book looks at the Mountain from this side, and a Good Movie looks at it from that side; but both are looking at the SAME Mountain.

    A BAD Movie is looking at a DIFFERENT Mountain. (Like Will Smith’s “I Robot”)

  8. hltrim52

    hltrim52 said, 4 months ago

    Haven’t seen it, not going to see it.

  9. Bakumanfan

    Bakumanfan said, 4 months ago

    I loved it

  10. Larry

    Larry said, 4 months ago

    i’ve got a dvd of the original “The Hobbit” animated. it’s pretty good.

  11. vwdualnomand

    vwdualnomand said, 4 months ago

    there are long and boring movies out there. twilight series, warren beatty’s red, fanny and alexander, woody allen’s manhattan, an unmarried woman, etc…

  12. rshive

    rshive said, 4 months ago

    Looks like it’s going to take more than water to revive Roy.

  13. Thomas Scott Roberts

    Thomas Scott Roberts said, 4 months ago

    @Tue Elung-Jensen

    Nobody would say that about the book. A common critique f the movie is that IT’S long where the book was short.

  14. Thomas Scott Roberts

    Thomas Scott Roberts said, 4 months ago

    @Leo Autodidact

    Good Metaphor.

  15. Thomas Scott Roberts

    Thomas Scott Roberts said, 4 months ago

    I actually liked it. Saw it twice. The 3D was fun but unnecessary. What I find is that- while movies sometimes tell the story differently from the book- those changes aren’t always wrong. Sometimes they’re valid- in terms of telling a story on film. Not everything that works in book CAN work on film. And yes, there are always things I might have done differently from what the director did. But in the end, I remind myself: It’s not a replacement for the book. It’s a movie BASED on the book. No more, no less.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (28).