Tony Auth by Tony Auth

Tony Auth

Comments (10) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Justice22

    Justice22 said, about 3 years ago

    It is just in the eye of the beholder.

  2. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    If you’re doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide from the giant surveillance apparatus the government’s been hiding.
    Stephen Colbert

  3. ysawyer1

    ysawyer1 said, about 3 years ago

    Hiding something, what about privacy, selective viewing or just plain boring mediocre casual talk, protect yourself at all times, opinions or facts. Legal issues, right to discourse … burden of proof lies where?

  4. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    “Only the guilty should be paranoid.”

    Yes, Ima, because no one has ever been falsely accused in the USA.

    Sigh.

    The following was added to a bill in 1995, and promptly voted down by the Republicans in Congress. Do you agree with their action?

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

  5. Doughfoot

    Doughfoot said, about 3 years ago

    @Anthony 2816

    Notice that the constitution does not say that the people have the right to be secure against reasonable searches and seizures, only unreasonable ones. The rest of it suggests a part of a standard of “reasonableness” but “reasonable” still remains a fairly subjective standard. During the American Revolution, private papers and letters were routinely seized and read by the “patriots” in their quest to prevent spying and identify loyalists in their midst. I only mention this as an historian, not intending to draw and specific conclusions.

  6. william sharpe

    william sharpe said, about 3 years ago

    If only the job of public service could be used to serve the public instead of building personal empires! What a wonderful change that would be.

  7. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, about 3 years ago

    If you have done nothing wrong … the government should keep out.

  8. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    “This is waht Obama is doing, and you are not lashing out against Obama”

    I haven’t decided yet whether I want to lash out against him…well, on this subject, anyway. I do know we want the government to nip in the bud any terrorist plots like the 9/11 team carried out over many months. Ignoring the Constitutional issues, what the NSA is doing might be the best…and perhaps only…way of doing that.

    The authors of the 4th amendment had no more knowledge of modern communication than the authors of the 2nd had of the destructive potential of modern arms.

  9. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    I am old enough, but I have no memory of Ronald Reagan having a working relationship with Osama bin Laden. Still, since that was during my medical school days, it isn’t surprising, since I had little time for anything else. I didn’t develop much interest in politics at all until I went to law school much later on.

    In any case, you might well be right. Not just bullets, but probably training in a lot of other what-are-now-called terrorist methods.

  10. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    “Really? If you Remember…”

    I’ve already told you that I don’t remember…and why. I’m not saying it didn’t happen.

    “you cannot bring yourself to criticize Obama for not only renewing The Patriot Act”

    I’ve criticized Obama for many other things, but like I said, on this topic I’m still trying to weigh it against preventing more 9/11s.

  11. Refresh Comments.