Tom Toles by Tom Toles

Tom Toles

Comments (14) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. braindead08

    braindead08 GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    Didn’t Mitch McConnell say that same thing?

  2. TJDestry

    TJDestry GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    How dare he remain loyal to his own nation? I thought he was supposed to be a reformer!

  3. edclectic

    edclectic said, about 3 years ago

    Wanna be just like USA!

  4. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    Their leader, the Supreme Ayatollah said in 2003 that nuclear energy is okay by the Koran, but nuclear weapons are not. There is no shred of evidence they are working on any nuclear bombs.

  5. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    In 1967, under the “Atoms for Peace” program launched by President Eisenhower, the US sold the Shah of Iran’s government a 5-megawatt, light-water type research reactor. This small dome-shaped structure, located in the Tehran suburbs, was the foundation of Iran’s nuclear program. It remains at the center of the controversy over Iranian intentions, even today.
    .
    That is because Iran says it needs more fuel for the reactor, which it insists it uses for basic research, and to produce medical isotopes. And the Tehran Research Reactor runs on uranium that is some 20 percent U-235 – an enrichment level higher than that currently produced by Iran’s Natanz enrichment facility.
    .
    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2009/1002/p04s01-usfp.html

  6. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 3 years ago

    You know a nuke is so final.

  7. Gregory Kruse

    Gregory Kruse GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    I came nis close to cancelling Tom Toles.

  8. Fuzzy Thinker (I)

    Fuzzy Thinker (I) GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    The new puppet says: “Trust Me. Reduce the sanctions now and then we can talk, sort of”.

  9. AgentSmith101

    AgentSmith101 said, about 3 years ago

    @ReasonsVentriloquist

    How about cautiously optimistic?

  10. jackson49

    jackson49 said, about 3 years ago

    NEVER a word about the ROYAL states that have the nukes power plants….always attacking the Republican forms of governments, as the Royals insist…as they install ‘democratic’ forms of stealling the oil…see IRAQ/Libia..BP royal Shell got their oil, the U-knighted states?
    We got the bill and the dead, and a greater Depression…

  11. Hawthorne

    Hawthorne said, about 3 years ago

    So why, exactly, isn’t it possible to have both?

    Oh, I forgot – no issue has more than two sides or two possibilities … sorry. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maximum culpa …

  12. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    Indeed. Since Democrats agree with Republicans on this fiction they are practically willing to attack Iran.

  13. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    @jackson49

    Iran in the bugaboo and the USA and its allies and the corporate media continue supporting this provocative myth as sanctions (war by economic means) hurts Iran.
    -
    Tremendous pressures. We probably wouldn’t have a militant fundamentalist Iran if their democratically elected president wasn’t assassinated by the CIA in 1953. It still wouldn’t be our ally though.

  14. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    At the same time we want more nuclear reactors for power, and even consider giving “suitcase” reactors to small countries to generate power locally, and conserve other resources, like petroleum, we don’t want Iran to generate electricity with a nuke, and sell us their oil, which was their initial plan?

  15. Refresh Comments.