Comments (7) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   HUMPHRIES said, 8 months ago

   It takes TT to state the obvious, but wait for the comments of those in denial ;o)

2. 

   shippingtroll said, 8 months ago

   It’s easiest to con a con, because they are looking for easy money.

3. 

   lalas said, 8 months ago

   Did you guys listen to the TAL links I posted… it’s rocking good stuff.

4. 

   LateToTheGame said, 8 months ago

   Wow, StewieZ actually agrees that the rampant deregulation of the banking industry allowed unchecked corporate interests to give in to their greed, knowing that the U.S. Government would have their backs if the deal went south, all the while complaining about the “interference” of said gov’t? I’m glad we’re on the same page finally.

5. 

   HUMPHRIES said, 8 months ago

   Why don’t we just choose both ?

6. 

   paullkellysr said, 8 months ago

   The banker is smiling - he know Uncle Sam will cover his loss

7. 

   Tukla Ratte said, 8 months ago

   And I’m sure the banker didn’t do everything in his power to convince the mortgagee that he could pay it back. I suppose that the mortgagee is stupid for expecting a lender to have ethics and do his job. Silly poor people, rich bankers don’t need ethic or hard work, they have you to cover their costs!

   And the “bail out both of them” doesn’t make any sense unless all those foreclosures are just a figment of my imagination.

   Sorry, Tom, but you were way off the mark on this one.