Tom the Dancing Bug by Ruben Bolling

Tom the Dancing Bug

Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. kapock

    kapock said, about 4 years ago

    Y’know, with that widow’s peak, maybe Ryan is the Count’s evil, innumerate twin.

  2. Linguist

    Linguist said, about 4 years ago

    Yeah, Ryan does have that wild eyed look about him.
    The difference is that the Count teaches us real math not fuzzy math.

  3. wcorvi

    wcorvi said, about 4 years ago

    Did you ever wonder why the Romney-types don’t want to cut military spending? They want us to be safer? Hardly! They get the lucrative military contracts that really do little for our safety. THAT is their part of the gummint handouts.

  4. Steve Plegge

    Steve Plegge said, about 4 years ago

    The Count’s evil twin? Evil, sure… but he’s still Eddie Munster to me.

  5. Andy

    Andy said, about 4 years ago

    Ryan IS the Count’s Evil Twin; Count Badly!

  6. indieme

    indieme GoComics PRO Member said, about 4 years ago

    Mitt IS a corporation, my friend.

  7. kapock

    kapock said, about 4 years ago

    “Will you throw me into debt, into debt on Sesame Street?”

  8. cipactli77

    cipactli77 said, about 4 years ago

    With all due respect to The Who

    Ryan know what it’s like to be the bad man to be the sad man behind blue eyes.

  9. Larry

    Larry said, about 4 years ago

    Parents know we got our money’s worth with Sesame Street.

  10. ronald rini

    ronald rini said, about 4 years ago

    I am in the minorty again but PBS should have commercials. I mean they have some good shows and it is about time they help pay for themselves. There are tons of companies that would pay to advertise on some of thier shows and they can use the extra from the muppets to pay for painting shows

  11. Alex Broadhead

    Alex Broadhead GoComics PRO Member said, about 4 years ago

    ronald rini – If PBS had commercials it would be the same as any other network, and would be beholden to advertisers to produce shows that hit the proper demographics. Or to put it another way: Why don’t the current networks produce shows like those on PBS, if they would attract the advertising dollars of ‘tons of companies’?

  12. Davepostmp

    Davepostmp said, about 4 years ago

    And all the money the oil companies get from the government! The taxpayers should get a piece of that pie, too! But all they get is the shaft of $4 and $5 gallon gasoline.

  13. Wabbit

    Wabbit GoComics PRO Member said, about 4 years ago

    Mitt and Paul are out to get rid of the poor. Leave them without healthcare, take away their kid’s schools, They think there are too many of us. I used to think the government paid for hearing aids, no they don’t and the little help we get, Romney is going to take away.
    We are supposed to be of , for, by, the people. It has changed already and is by, for, and of the rich. The real re-distribution of wealth has been going on for years, and it is not tricking down but flowing up.

  14. MiepR

    MiepR said, about 4 years ago

    If medical journals weren’t dependent on pharmaceutical advertising we would have unbiased publishing of clinical trials for drugs. If PBS took ads, we would have educational programming biased by the preferences of the advertisers.

  15. Guard Mouse

    Guard Mouse said, about 4 years ago

    If that is supposed to be the Muppet News Anchorman, he’s got to be related to Bert ….

  16. Load the rest of the comments (4).