Comments (31) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   NebulousRikulau said, almost 2 years ago

   Can we limit Congress on voting their own pay raises this way?
2. 

   bdaverin said, almost 2 years ago

   And can the cartoonist learn the difference between “cooperating in a group NATO mission” and “unilateral war?”
3. 

   QuiteDragon said, almost 2 years ago

   Um, I believe you forgotten the most important condition, Mr. Bolling. That is, to wage war, the President ***must*** lead the charge.
4. 

   PossumPete said, almost 2 years ago

   ^ Like Bush did? Then it will be “Mission Accomplished”!
5. 

   serion pacific said, almost 2 years ago

   Actually, I think this is a commentary on the laws designed to prevent women from getting abortions: must travel out of state, must watch a sonogram and/or hear a description of an embryo or fetus at that stage of development, may not use federal funds.
6. 

   serion pacific said, almost 2 years ago

   Oh yeah, the waiting period laws as well.
7. 

   prider said, almost 2 years ago

   Brilliant! Just brilliant! Thanks, Ruben.
8. 

   Ironman92 said, almost 2 years ago

   See, this isn’t really a comment on the war, guys. It’s a comment on how difficult it is to get an abortion. Because the war procedure on OtherEarth is the same as the abortion procedure here. /Explained
9. 

   liliann said, almost 2 years ago

   Thanks, Ironman92. I was wondering when somebody was going to point out what seemed obvious.
10. 

    annamargaret1866 said, almost 2 years ago

    @liliann

    Ditto.
11. 

    Wildcard24365 said, almost 2 years ago

    @liliann

    Well, it is an interesting contrast between how hard it is for one (1) woman to have an abortion versus how relatively easy it is for one (1) President to commit the military to, well… war, or whatever newspeak phrase he uses to call the governmental act of hurting people and breaking things.
12. 

    beenthere240 said, almost 2 years ago

    The problem is that if the restraints on war making seem reasonable, then maybe the roadblocks to abortion aren’t so bad. No federal funds for war, a cooling off period, looking at the consequences of the planned action. It’s a great piece of satire but it really does work both ways.
13. 

    person918 said, almost 2 years ago

    but see, forcing the president to have a 72-hour waiting period before starting a war would be patronizing because men carefully and rationally think through all actions before making them. women, on the other hand, are prone to abort children on a whim if they haven’t had enough chocolate that day, missed a shoe sale, etc.
14. 

    person918 said, almost 2 years ago

    *prone to aborting (?)
15. 

    pschearer said, almost 2 years ago

    “Lean forward”? Can MS-NBC really believe their new catch-phrase will deflect attention from how far they lean Left?
16. Load the rest of the comments (16).