Tim Eagan by Tim Eagan

Tim EaganNo Zoom

Comments (21) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Basqueian

    Basqueian said, over 2 years ago

    That seems about right. And if we were waging war on men, we would be done already.

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    They aren’t that mature.

  3. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 2 years ago

    Why DOES every controversy in America need to be a war?

    We even have “Cupcake Wars” and “Pawn Wars”. What does this say about us? Is this truly who we are?

  4. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, over 2 years ago

    An Excellent Toon. Nothing like the small, the profane and puerile having some flack mixed into their endless meal of Testosterone Toasties.

  5. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 2 years ago

    And according to Mr. Huckabee, she can’t control her libido either.
    Well, at least they’re allowed to drive and vote… so far.
    Though, after Ms. Davis announced she was running for Gov, the Texas legislatures working on that too.

  6. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago

    I’ll say it again: If it’s solely a woman’s right to choose as the Progressives keep telling us, then why do men have to pay child support?

  7. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 2 years ago

    The sad thing is that the law that Huckabee is so outraged about — that private insurance companies need to cover contraceptives — is identical to a Republican law he signed in Georgia in 2005 requiring private insurance companies to cover contraceptives. America is not fleeing the Republican party, the Republican party is fleeing America.

  8. Stipple

    Stipple said, over 2 years ago

    Burn them, burn all of them. Turn those babies loose on an unsuspecting male market.
    Then take the country while the men are distracted.
    From the early days of women’s rights.
    Since none of this makes any sense at all I thought I would bring up more silly from the past.

  9. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago

    If it is solely the woman’s decision regarding the child from conception then men should have no part whatsoever in supporting that child regardless of what their economic status is.
    Now, if it is a COUPLE’s right to choose, that is the man has an equal role in the social contract from conception to age of majority we can discuss child support. But, if only the woman is involved (eg., “A Woman’s Right to Choose” as the Progressive Left demands and says so frequently) then child support from men should be abolished in its entirety.

  10. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago

    Oh, I will add, that if it truly were “A Woman’s Right to Choose” and there was no child support abortion would be a whole lot less common as you can bet women would be a lot more choosy about having sex at all knowing they are going to be stuck with the potential outcome of that act.

  11. alise duhon

    alise duhon said, over 2 years ago

    Since he’s so fond of spouting misogynist BS, I would say yes, he’s single. Any woman with intelligence or a speck of self-esteem would avoid him like the plague his kind is.

  12. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago

    That wasn’t what I meant by “choosy” Genome. I meant that as synomous with “selective.” That is, women would be far more careful about who they were partners with and less willing to engage in casual sex.

  13. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 2 years ago


    Enoki, my mother married three times and had children with two of them. All three left her. My father’s second wife, a woman I met as an adult, had two children with him… he left her too and got mad at me when I was angry with him for kissing another woman, intimately, prior to his leaving her. In too many cases, men leave their children, no matter how many children they have with the women with whom they consort. They also lie to the women. The reverse is also true, but only within the last couple of decades. Boomers are much worse bout this attitude than Gen X.
    Your hypothesis is rather brutal and ignores too many factors.

  14. spyderred

    spyderred said, over 2 years ago


    Because they’re to use birth control too and were there at conception so are responsible for the result. Find a book at the library on human reproduction and read it.

  15. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago

    @Respectful Troll

    My position RT is a simplification. That is clear. What it is in general is that it isn’t “A Woman’s Right to Choose” but rather a social contract, just like any other contract, between two individuals and should be handled as such from conception to age of majority.
    That is, the man and woman are equally responsible for ALL decisions regarding that child from the moment of conception.
    Giving either party sole responsiblity for any part of that contract is simply wrong. Both should choose whether or not to have a child and both should be equally responsible for that child once they have it.
    It shouldn’t favor or disadvantage either party. Right now, like it or not, the system heaviliy favors women. It shouldn’t. It should be completely neutral and favor neither party.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (6).