Tim Eagan by Tim Eagan

Tim EaganNo Zoom

Comments (27) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Lin Collingwood

    Lin Collingwood said, over 3 years ago

    So not true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Bill

    Bill said, over 3 years ago

    And our gutless senators kill even a weak proposal to put simple background checks on buyers of these weapons of death. Shame on them—but even more shame on the ignorant voters who put these demagogues into office. Good old USA, land of the gun nuts and home of the slaughtered.

  3. Ryan (Say what now‽)

    Ryan (Say what now‽) GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    It’s been years since I went to the USA. I’m not sure I want to go back until thay have more control of their guns.

  4. Liam Burns

    Liam Burns GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    NRA is the evil. Except for the Ricin suspect, who is a liberal Democrat. Or the Sandy Hook shooter, who was registered Democrat who hated Christians and was on psych meds. Or the Aurora theater shooter, who is a Democrat and OWS participant, was on psych meds and has converted to Islam. Or the Fort Hood shooter who is a Democrat and a Muslim. Or the Columbine shooters, both on psych meds, too young to vote but their parents were progressive liberal Democrats. So somehow this is the fault of the NRA? Does anyone else see a pattern here?

  5. Randy_B

    Randy_B GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    @Liam Burns

    The Ricin suspect is anti-government and is accused of sending poisoned letters to a Democratic President, a Republican Senator, and a local judge,so you’re way off base on that one. The NRA wants us to continue to allow these people to get guns. So, are the NRA a group of “liberal Democrats” too?

  6. rmacprivate

    rmacprivate said, over 3 years ago

    @Ryan (Say what now‽)

    Been to Mexico, lately?

  7. packratjohn

    packratjohn said, over 3 years ago

    @Liam Burns

    Pattern? Yes. People with mental issues killing others. What can we do to stem the tide? Well, some basic control on weapons would be helpful. It’s not THE answer, it is a step toward sanity. I suspect it takes more paperwork to by a large quantity of fertilizer than it does to by firearms.

  8. rmacprivate

    rmacprivate said, over 3 years ago

    Yeah, it can get dicey on that mental deficient question, if one of your buddies is there with you.

  9. totalloser

    totalloser GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    the second amendment was written over 200 years ago when it took you a minute or more between shots, and most people where subsistence farmers. Now you can get off dozens of shots in a matter of seconds and we live close together. What is wrong with having a check before buying a gun, maybe we should make it like owning a car. You need license to operate, insurance to use, and you have to pay out to a party you injure with it.

  10. D C

    D C GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Raises the significant question, why was LaPierre for gun control before he was against it? The reality is that the NRA used to be much more in line with the majority of the country — http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-of-guns/308608/?single_page=true

  11. totalloser

    totalloser GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    As the long as the marriage is between consenting adults marry as many people as you want. But first we need to remove tax breaks for marriage and children

  12. lmonteros

    lmonteros said, over 3 years ago

    I always find that phrase “any changes” interesting. Are you allowed to own a bazooka, a grenade launcher, a military tank, a bomb? No. So are you advocating that these weapons be legalized for public use so we don’t go down that “slippery slope”? I doubt it.

    Also, please remember that just a few years ago, the NRA supported background checks. It seems to me that a few folks at the NRA—not all the members by any means—are more interested in maintaining their own negative political power than in representing gun owners.

  13. lmonteros

    lmonteros said, over 3 years ago

    @D C

    Personal power.

  14. Duane Ott

    Duane Ott said, over 3 years ago

    Freedom of speech, religion, and assembly are absolute rights. There is no prior restraint. The laws are enforced for abuse of those rights. The second amendment is likewise absolute. We can pass laws against the abuse of that right, but any law that allows prior restraint is probably not what our forefathers had in mind.

  15. Last Rose of Summer

    Last Rose of Summer GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    lest see now, we have two radical extremists (maybe) who spent last nite in a fire fight with the Watertown cops. Just where did they get att the weaponery? We are beng attacked by people who have been radicalized by who knows, and we simply have to put some kind of protective order in place. I grew up in a household with hunting guns and shot my first deer as an 11 year old girl, but my father would be the first person to want gun controls in light of recent events. Something (underlined) must be done people!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (12).