Comments (8) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   JDG said, 9 months ago

   Print too small. Enlarges too blurry to read.

2. 

   farren said, 9 months ago

   Nah. It’s blurry, but not that blurry. I’d provide the transliteration, but there’s just too much of it. Just re-read the last 30 days, and catch it full-sized.

3. 

   CountyBloomer said, 9 months ago

   Reiterations of 10-year-old re-runs?

   This goes beyond lame.

4. 

   farren said, 9 months ago

   It’s not a reiteration of a rerun. It’s one or the other, not both. So why is this comic lame when Calvin and Hobbes is not?

5. 

   MikeBx said, 9 months ago

   Even in “View Larger” it was unreadable. Too pixilated.

6. 

   cking33 said, 9 months ago

   Please make your comic strips bigger! With plenty of web page real estate, there is no reason for the images to be so small!

7. 

   Coffee-Turtle said, 9 months ago

   indeed this is way too tiny! zooming and enlarging is way too blurry.

   haha!

8. 

   Sternvogel said, 9 months ago

   CountyBloomer’s characterization of the strip as a “reiteration of reruns” is correct. Strips of ten years ago were re-run over the past month, and this panel reiterated selected examples of those strips. (In 1999, today’s offering was simply a reiteration of then-new material.)