New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis

New Adventures of Queen Victoria

Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Alexikakos

    Alexikakos said, almost 2 years ago

    “New Adventures of Queen Victoria”
    Upon Googling it, I found this in Wikipedia. (About a 7 minute read, without going into the notes.)


    Wikipedia on “United States v. Windsor”

    Section 3 of the “Defense of Marriage Act,” (DOMA) citing the struck down provision by strike-over.

    Section 3. Definition of marriage (ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court)
    In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.

  2. Sherlock Watson

    Sherlock Watson said, almost 2 years ago

    Somehow, a joke just doesn’t seem appropriate here, so I’ll just say: Well done, Pab.

  3. dukedoug

    dukedoug said, almost 2 years ago

    Oh, I don’t know … I’m sure they’ll make like The Flintstones and have a “gay, old time” !!

  4. Z Blair

    Z Blair GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    Well done, Pab. Thank YOU!

  5. MamaRose

    MamaRose GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    Huh?

  6. echoraven

    echoraven said, almost 2 years ago

    @masterskrain

    At some point in time we really need to greet the 21 century and that was a good first step.

  7. Linguist

    Linguist said, almost 2 years ago

    One should always be in love. That is the reason one should never marry.
    Oscar Wilde

  8. jadoo823

    jadoo823 said, almost 2 years ago

    …glad to see it happen…don’t know what all the fuss was about. As a long-married, now separated, lapsed Catholic female, I really never saw how two people in love and wanting to be married could possible negatively impact my own marriage in any way (it blew up all on it’s own)…

  9. Pauljmsn

    Pauljmsn said, almost 2 years ago

    I’ve said it before: Two guys wanting to get hitched because they only have eyes for each other are much less of a threat to the institution of marriage than some drunk who uses his wife for a punching bag.

    Besides that, if abortion finally gets banned (which I doubt will happen, but still…), somebody will have to be there to adopt the unwanted babies. The gay couples will be happy to do so, I think, and that is very pro-life.

  10. pcolli

    pcolli said, almost 2 years ago

    @masterskrain

    He was the Quentin Crisp of his day, only more literate.

  11. Blackwolff9

    Blackwolff9 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    @jadoo823

    And no one has ever cited “gay marriage” as a reason for divorce!

  12. pcolli

    pcolli said, almost 2 years ago

    @Blackwolff9

    Not yet…but a lot of marriages have ended due to the realisation by one of the parties realising they have a preference. I made up my mind after my “het” marriage ended.

  13. gmartin997

    gmartin997 said, almost 2 years ago

    Are we talking about homosexuals? Oh, God, this being England, I should have guessed.

  14. Kali39

    Kali39 said, almost 2 years ago

    Thank you indeed – it was a long time coming. I always thought Prop 8 was one of the stupidest laws ever passed in California, in any case. (Not the stupidest, of course — we still have Prop 13 on the books).
    ..
    And anyway, same sex relationships statistically last longer than male-female relationships. So there.

  15. Furienna

    Furienna said, almost 2 years ago

    Sigh… It’s a shame to see so many “liberal” dimwits over here, who think accepting gay marriage is so cool. Humans were created to be male and female for a reason. Man/man or woman/woman just won’t do, no matter how much you will hate my opinion.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (2).