New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis

New Adventures of Queen VictoriaNo Zoom

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. yyyguy

    yyyguy said, almost 4 years ago

    in my university days we used to joke about the mounties pre-reading our mail. (yes, i’m hopelessly analog.)

  2. pcolli

    pcolli said, almost 4 years ago

    I wish I’d witnessed the shaving foam “pie” incident.
    I wonder how many people in the room surpressed a laugh.

  3. Coyoty

    Coyoty GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    She out-Foxed him.

  4. vwdualnomand

    vwdualnomand said, almost 4 years ago

    murdoch’s company has lost billions in market cap since this broke. barely a mention on fox news and fox business. wsj plays the victim. casualties are mounting. murdoch says he is charge, but says that he really isn’t day to day. Then, why is his company paying people off?

  5. Samskara

    Samskara said, almost 4 years ago

    Among his other sins, Rupert Murdoch has irreparably harmed the quality and reputation of two of the world’s great newspapers, the Times of London and the Wall Street Journal. Perhaps the one satisfaction is that his activities were uncovered by means of good journalism as a sort of reverse of Gresham’s Law. Of course if quality makes a resurgence, Queen Vic may become one of the most popular comics in the wold.

  6. grapfhics

    grapfhics said, almost 4 years ago

    Murdoch’s statement that it’s not his fault reminds me if the boss complaining he is surrounded by idiots, what does that make him?

  7. Lewreader

    Lewreader said, almost 4 years ago

    If it had happened here it would be nothing. How many times has the NYT and Washington Post defied court orders, not divulged their sources and printed state secrets.
    Want to hear a cell phone? Turn on you AM radio. Supreme Court says cops don’t need court orders to record cells. No expectation of privacy. Thank you liberals.

  8. CoBass

    CoBass said, almost 4 years ago

    I, too, am appalled by the actions of “News of the World” and the other related stores coming out of Britain. OTOH, I can’t help but noting that they did what they did because they thought it would sell newspapers. By and large, they were right. I wonder how many of the people in Britain who are now outraged by NotW and Murdoch’s sleazy tabloid journalism were perfectly happy, even eager, to pay good money for it at the time.

  9. Lewreader

    Lewreader said, almost 4 years ago

    You mean privacy is only dimly infered by the 4th Amendment.?
    You mean this case would tie up the court for decades. “I can’t define a cell phone but I’ll sign a two year contract if you give me one.”

  10. Christopher Shea

    Christopher Shea said, almost 4 years ago

    Yes, in Lewreader-world, journalists not divulging their sources is TOTALLY the same thing as “journalists” hacking into the phone of a 13-year-old murder victim.

  11. prrdh

    prrdh said, almost 4 years ago

    @grapfhics

    He’s not saying he’s surrounded by idiots. He’s saying he’s surrounded by people who are very capable, but unscrupulous. He may be telling the truth. Unlike, it seems, most people, I can’t read other people’s minds and hearts.

  12. prrdh

    prrdh said, almost 4 years ago

    @Christopher Shea

    It’s not the same thing at all. Journalists not divulging their sources can be a lot more damaging to a lot more people.

  13. j m

    j m said, almost 4 years ago

    To hack, or not to hack. Ziss iss zee qvestion.

  14. pabsungenis

    pabsungenis said, almost 4 years ago

    Why do I keep feeling like I’ve stumbled onto Non Sequitur’s comments page by mistake?

  15. pabsungenis

    pabsungenis said, almost 4 years ago

    Oh, and another shameless plug for my new novel: http://gotohellnovel.com

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).