Ted Rall by Ted Rall

Ted Rall

Comments (5) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. echoraven

    echoraven said, over 2 years ago

    Black and White, nice touch.

  2. packratjohn

    packratjohn said, over 2 years ago

    Wow, Deja Vu…. again. Go check out today’s Doonesbury.

  3. Miss Demure

    Miss Demure GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Appreciate your fine satire. Hope others do as well. Peace Keeping: deluded euphemism.

  4. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    A few hundred (or fewer) “advisors” into Afghanistan would have been far more effective at getting bin Laden, and taken away the excuse to invade Iraq.

  5. TJDestry

    TJDestry GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Learn some history. When the French left Indochina, the agreement was for a divided Vietnam until elections could be held. The West aided the South Vietnamese gov’t in postponing the elections because it was clear that Ho Chi Minh would win. When the North Vietnamese attacked, aided by the large numbers of South Vietnamese who also opposed the Saigon gov’t, they drove out the French forces and our adventure of “military advisers” began, until it became obvious that the effort was unsustainable.

    So when we withdrew (two years before this scene), it was because we were tired of propping up a corrupt government that was not representative of the mass of Vietnamese people, not because they asked us to or because we felt they were at a point of self-sustaining, but, most important in this comparison, we had not toppled a government that had previously kept the nation unified.

    Hussein, for all his faults, had kept Iraq in place and we disrupted that. There is a difference between propping up something that cannot work and destroying something that did work.

  6. Refresh Comments.