Ted Rall by Ted Rall

Ted Rall

Comments (10) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon said, 5 months ago

    The third panel reminds me of some of some of the knee-jerk posts on these boards.

  2. Ruff

    Ruff GoComics PRO Member said, 5 months ago

    @Zuhlamon

    Not quite, Zulu. Everything appears to be spelled correctly.

  3. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 5 months ago

    Without some kind of decent pay, the news just becomes fluff and sensationalized and ultimately useless as an information source.

  4. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon said, 5 months ago

    @Ruff

    lol! rightchooare…

  5. Liz Dexic

    Liz Dexic GoComics PRO Member said, 5 months ago

    …though Rachel Maddow, Steve Kornacki, Chris Hayes and Lawrence O’Donnel are all doing excellent jobs.

  6. anonim

    anonim said, 5 months ago

    @Dexic Lawrence O’Donnel is a third rate bargain bin discount Bill O’reilly.

  7. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon said, 5 months ago

    @Liz Dexic

    Conservatives have a real hard time refuting them – which is why they won’t appear on their shows (at least, more than once).

  8. Ethaniel67

    Ethaniel67 said, 5 months ago

    @Zuhlamon

    You can’t refute someone who doesn’t use facts but only emotions.

    Its the old “So when did you stop beating your wife” trick. To which almost any reply can be followed up with liar (and you get to somehow prove the unprovable again) or how dare you ever do that.

  9. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon said, 5 months ago

    @Ethaniel67

    You can’t refute someone who doesn’t use facts but only emotions.
    .
    That would be the FOX News “Opinion” reporting (which is seamless with actual “news” reporting). Good luck trying to refute Rachel Maddow – the conservatives have been trying (without success) to do so factually, so they resort to the age-old method of smear.

  10. jrmerm

    jrmerm said, 5 months ago

    One doesn’t “refute” Rachael Madcow, one simply laughs at her.

  11. Refresh Comments.