Ted Rall by Ted Rall

Ted Rall

Comments (25) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, about 1 year ago

    That purty talk fooled millions(twice) into thinking a community organizer was qualified to be prez.
    Woops.

  2. TJDestry

    TJDestry GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Only Ted really gets it. He should be our leader.

  3. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    So the guy on the right is a FAUX Noise viewer?

  4. Ottodesu

    Ottodesu GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    It was obvious Romney was a commie bastid, ’cos that lefty Prezdent used his health care plan.

  5. jrmerm

    jrmerm said, about 1 year ago

    M5: this sort of tirade is pretty common

  6. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @PAJ

    Actually, I don’t even own a television…I just see enough on-line reports to know what FAUX is a FARCE!

  7. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 1 year ago

    Here are just some of the reasons that one voter voted against Romney:

    1. “Emergency Room Care is Free.”

    2. “Leave health care to the states.” See my post under Mr. Varvel for explanation.

    3. “Government does not create jobs.” Second presidential debate.

    4. “I will create 12 million jobs.” Second presidential debate.

    5. “If you can’t afford college, ask your parents.”

    6. “America is right, and you are wrong.” (Showing how easily he can lose his temper; a response to a wheelchair-bound man who asked him if he would support medical marijuana, after saying it was the only thing that helped his pain. He asked the question 3 times, and Romney did not answer three times. He asked a fourth time, and Romney lost his temper. Whether you think medical marijuana is legitimate or not, do you want a hair-trigger temper next to the A-bomb button?)

    7. “Corporations are people, my friend.” This tells me that, if there is a President Romney, there will be more Supreme Court justices who will support idiotic ideas like that one, and the one that allowed a private firm to take private land under the guise of “eminent domain”.

    While it is true that voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil, this was the only choice we were given.

    Not every Obama voter is as uninformed as you would like us to be. Calling me names will not change a darned thing.

    Now, we can work together to effect meaningful and necessary change, or we can continue to insult one another. Choose wisely.

  8. edclectic

    edclectic said, about 1 year ago

    “And so it goes…”. Miss ya Kurt and Molly, too.

  9. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, about 1 year ago

    @ConserveGov

    Yes knowing that he is really a Machiavellian Constitutionalist and Plutocrat instead. A Regressive bent on putting us into a rapacious empire.

  10. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Ms. Ima

    So if drones are saving American lives everyday that means they are a good thing, right? And since President Obama has expanded the use of drones, that means President Obama did a good thing, right? Don’t let your reDUMBlican handlers catch you agreeing with the President on ANYTHING. That would be tantamount to treason to your party.

  11. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @jrmerm

    Funny, I thought the same thing, a couple form the left and at least a whole handful from the right.

  12. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @I Play One On TV

    “Now, we can work together to effect meaningful and necessary change, or we can continue to insult one another. Choose wisely.”
    You write this to those you are addressing and then end with and expect them to “Choose wisely.” You do realize those claiming the “low-information,” and “uninformed voters” are they themselves exactly what they accuse others of and therefore are not likely to be able to do anything “wisely” don’t you? However I agree with everything you wrote. If only we could get people to educate themselves enough to be able to “Choose wisely” we could get everyone to “work together to effect meaningful and necessary change.”
    But sadly I have little faith in the altruistic nature of the American society and therefore believe that people will choose to “continue to insult one another.” Yes I know I am guilty of that activity, however if we don’t identify the problem (ignorant members of society voting as “their party” tells them to instead of actually educating themselves) then we will never find a solution. And yes I know that, to paraphrase your comment on Lisa Benson, “Anyone who feels that [insults are productive] has finished the conversation before he starts.” I try, but it is so hard when faced with such ignorance as some on here insist on posting as if it were true.
    Now if we could cultivate a few more members to match your, and MikeFive’s and Respectful Troll’s level of civility, respect and thoughtfulness. Thank you for fighting the good fight and having tolerance for wretches like me.

  13. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @PAJ

    Masterskrain does not have to make thinks up he reads online from faux “news” they already made it up. As for the insurance commercial, if you read something on faux “news’” website or an item (dis)credited to faux and then can substantiate it is from faux then it is true, not false that faux said what they posted online. Taht is not to say what faux said was true, just that they said it was true. I know that is a hard concept for a “CONservative” like yoru ilk to understand, but if faux “news” posted it and Masterskrain reads it online, it is true that faux “news” posted it, but it is incumbent upon the reader to judge if it is accurate or not. In my experience at best they post 1/2 of the story or 1/2 of the truth. They conveniently omit the parts that don’t agree with or would dilute their predetermined conclusion.

  14. mikefive

    mikefive said, about 1 year ago

    @jrmerm

    Yeah, I know, and I seldom comment on them. This one just seemed particularly egregious.

  15. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, about 1 year ago

    @masterskrain

    MASTERSKRAIN said " I just see enough on-line reports to know what FAUX is a FARCE!"

    Reading distorted propaganda on Media Matters about what some liberal dipstick thinks Fox News said in a report is not “seeing on line reports”.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (10).