Ted Rall by Ted Rall

Ted Rall

Comments (31) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. pcolli

    pcolli said, over 4 years ago

    Justice? Innocent until proven guilty?

  2. iangoodson

    iangoodson said, over 4 years ago

    Polluting the jury-pool?

  3. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, over 4 years ago

    Now you’ve done it! You woke up all the nutcases. Don’t you know anyone wearing a hoody is up to no good???

  4. Bilword

    Bilword said, over 4 years ago

    ain’t it the truth

  5. ScullyUFO

    ScullyUFO said, over 4 years ago

    One of the posters above accidentally understood Mr. Rall.

  6. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, over 4 years ago

    Because the NAACP and the Black Panthers declared it racist for anyone to defend themselves against law breakers of colored origin.

  7. Ransom D Stone

    Ransom D Stone said, over 4 years ago

    With each new cartoon TR proves again that he is an idiot.

  8. k8giggles

    k8giggles said, over 4 years ago

    @Pemigewasset
    People often will rise (or fall) to expectations set upon them by others, and crime and poverty are not unique to any subset of our society. We lose something fundamental to our humanity if we take such a derivative stance as suspecting folks of wrong doing simply because of what they’re wearing on their head (whether hoodie or turban).

    As a nation and as an individual, the moral high ground is lost once it is decided to take preemptive action using deadly force. Even in the “best” case scenario (and it’s really hard to consider any possibility in the case good), there are unconscionable actions that need to be answered for. I hope I’m never in such a situation, but if I ever shoot someone in self-defense, I expect to be taken into custody—even if I didn’t kill the person.

    While there are occasions when deadly force is necessary no one should be able to use it with complete impunity.

  9. Ardvarck

    Ardvarck GoComics PRO Member said, over 4 years ago

    I have four hoodies and I’m 72. Am I in danger?

  10. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, over 4 years ago

    Apparently the law as written says in effect that I can kill anyone I THINK is a danger to me, then it’s up to the state to prove I was wrong. Further, the law is so written that it favors the killer. By their logic, it would appear that I could go to Florida, kill anyone, and claim I felt threatened by him since I THOUGHT he might decide to shoot me too if I walked thru his area armed with an ice tea..
    “Blessed are the lawmakers for they shall confuse the issue.”

  11. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, over 4 years ago

    Yes… its obviously the same case and same conditions.

  12. Kylop

    Kylop said, over 4 years ago

    Its the skittles. They’re just so…..threatening

  13. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 4 years ago

    I am reminded of the same event as Baslim, as well as three 2,000 pound bombs dropped on a restaurant in Baghdad because a guy with a mustache sat down to dinner.


    The real issue is our “national moral compass” has been spinning like a top for a long time, but especially since “change” arrived; in 1981!

  14. fuzzeebc

    fuzzeebc said, over 4 years ago

    So if Zimmerman wasn’t arrested, why was he videotaped walking into the police station WEARING HANDCUFFS?

  15. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, over 4 years ago

    @Ardvarck

    Yes you are sir. Burn them immediately and put on an official NRA flak jacket.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (16).