Ted Rall by Ted Rall

Ted Rall

Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Lavocat

    Lavocat said, almost 3 years ago

    Because, really, it’s only all about the money.

    Always has been, always will be.

  2. halfabug

    halfabug said, almost 3 years ago

    I still don’t understand how how can tell us we have to make sacrifices,yet get 35 grand a plate for dinnner. Why can’t he spread some of that around to the poor.

  3. Simon Seamount

    Simon Seamount said, almost 3 years ago

    The bail-out would have worked better if he had given every individual $100,000 and let us pay off all our debts. So the banks would have gotten the money anyway, but then people would own their homes instead of being homeless and jobless.

  4. Rx71Wm29

    Rx71Wm29 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    Rall’s been taking his “bash Obama” meds again!

  5. Gary Kleppe

    Gary Kleppe said, almost 3 years ago

    It’s all relative. The money spent on campaigns is enormous compared to what most individuals have, but it’s much smaller than you’d need to substantially reduce poverty. That’s why banksters and other elitists will gladly pay for the former, so they don’t have to pay for the latter.

  6. SaltWaterCroc

    SaltWaterCroc said, almost 3 years ago

    And the Republicans have done what over the past 3 years (besides voting No to everything but tax cuts)?

  7. Adam Sperry

    Adam Sperry said, almost 3 years ago

    @Simon Seamount

    Ding-ding-ding! Exactly.
    I couldn’t believe the banks who got us into this mess got all the money.

  8. yohannbiimu

    yohannbiimu said, almost 3 years ago

    @SaltWaterCroc

    Sorry, that’s ONE year…because Obama’s had it all for the first two, and we all know how wonderful those years were…OH, that’s right…they were LOUSY. But of course you gotta blame those years on Bush too, right?

  9. fuzzeebc

    fuzzeebc said, almost 3 years ago

    the only job Obozo is interested in is his.

  10. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, almost 3 years ago

    At least it would only be 1% being poor then.

  11. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    We would have been better off if they had created make work jobs with the money instead of giving tax breaks to business to ship jobs overseas.

  12. denis1112

    denis1112 said, almost 3 years ago

    @SaltWaterCroc

    Well,from 2009 to 2010 the dims controlled congress,the senate,and the white house.They did nothing to make anything better.Things only got worse.Who do you think is giving Obama and the dims all the campaign funds?It ain’t the unemployed or welfare queens that vote for dims.It’s the recipients of the last round of stymulus money.Shovel ready jobs.Yea something was shovel ready alright.

  13. mcasenl

    mcasenl said, almost 3 years ago

    I am a random wino, and I am offended!

  14. INGSOC

    INGSOC GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    Obama is going to bypass congress then push for a Jobs Bill for his campaign trail…. His fake message is essentially geared for his Re Election….

  15. Pete Rogan

    Pete Rogan GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    You know, this could work. The 1% have an awful reputation right now. What if they plowed their money back into improving their workforce and strengthening the country instead of shipping jobs overseas and worrying about Chinese capital? At the very least it would keep them from hiring foreign troops to protect their ill-gotten gains from ever-increasing mobs. After all, sooner or later we’ll just decide it’s not about the money, and just start hanging and burning the people we feel are responsible. So it might be a good idea to be visibly for rebuilding America now. Before you go up like a greasy bonfire.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (5).