Ted Rall by Ted Rall

Ted RallNo Zoom

Comments (11) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. kreole

    kreole said, over 5 years ago

    800 year old right? Wha ?

  2. omQ R

    omQ R said, over 5 years ago

    ^ kreole wondered: ”800 year old right? Wha ?” Magna Carta, 1215. Ok, so he rounded up from 796 and a couple of months. Runnymede is only a few miles from me. Hmmm, it’s going to be a nice sunny day, I have the day off, I think I shall dump the comics today & cycle over there.

  3. C. A. Brobst

    C. A. Brobst GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    Put them on a US military transport and bus them to a federal max.

  4. mjnyc

    mjnyc said, over 5 years ago

    If the president had true cojones, he’d threaten to pardon any prisoner that Congress doesn’t allow him to move to the USA.

  5. T A B

    T A B GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    “The Main Reason Given”…

    that, and right-wing sewn fear of spooky muslims being right here, in ‘merka right next to granny! How can we possibly have fair trials by juries of citizens? Nope, let’s just leave it to the military. It’s War, after all.

    Even though the crimes of 9-11 were a strike against the U.S. government by fanatical murderers, they were also commited, by and large, on private U.S. citizens. Where is our voice? When is it New York City’s turn to render a verdict on this heinous crime?

    No money to pay for it? That’s RICH!!

  6. beenthere41

    beenthere41 said, over 5 years ago

    Somehow, I can’t see any trial held in New York returning a verdict of “Not Guilty” to anyone. Is that a fair trial? As for Ted, where is it a given that a Military trial would be a “Kangaroo Court”?

  7. jrmerm

    jrmerm said, over 5 years ago

    BT41: if you believe in completely fair trials, a lot of the verdicts in a civilian court would have to be “Not Guilty”. This is for various reasons, but the main ones seem to be concerned with the defendant’s right to have access to ALL evidence and the fact that normal police procedures were not followed. The problem is that for the vast majority of these prisoners, a civilian trial is totally inappropriate and you have to wonder what in the world people were thinking when they thought conventional criminal trial were a good idea.

  8. OtisIzaltumuch

    OtisIzaltumuch said, over 5 years ago

    Gitmo may not be better than San Quentin in any other way, but if you want to hold random Afghan goatherds forever without charges & without evidence, it is “out of sight.”

  9. Iron Handed

    Iron Handed said, over 5 years ago

    Another reason to get rid of the baggage fees

  10. William Bednar

    William Bednar GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    Maybe Rall wants to have the Gitmo detainees tried in a British court? That sounds like a great idea! Let’s ship all the detainees to Britain now!!

  11. omQ R

    omQ R said, over 5 years ago

    ^ Not sure why you’re bringing the British into this but I suppose Diego Garcia would fit the bill instead. Oh, wait, they have before. There you go then.

  12. Refresh Comments.