Oscar54: You obviously have enough money for an internet connection.
How dare you keep any of your money while people don’t have healthcare or enough food (by their standards) Or air conditioning.
The problem with forced taking from one set of people and giving to another set is actually defining when enough is enough. Civil societies actually solved this BEFORE the government got involved.
Are you sure government involvement in all these items actually made things better? Or does it just make you feel better that you empower a third party to steal from those you may not like to give to causes you feel are justified.
Be a man and do it yourself if your that committed and see how far you get before you realize its immoral. And if its immoral for you to “rob from the rich to give to the poor” how is it moral for you to justify a third party to do the same?