Stuart Carlson by Stuart Carlson

Stuart Carlson

Recommended

Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, about 1 year ago

    The Senate can vote all they want. The House will destroy any last bit of goodness in the bill. It’s over. You are now all property of the gun manufacturers and their puppet, the NRA. Bow to your masters!

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    There are roughly 70 million firearm owners in America. About 4 million folks are members in the NRA.(claims vary from 3.5 to 4.5 million members) which means like me, not many firearms owners choose to support the NRA’s radical postiions. Why DOES such a small group of folks hold so much power? (Hmm, look at AIPAC membership as well.)


    AARP has over 22 million members, and gee, they actually get benefits from membership, and represenation for sensible and viable legislation! While they oppose radical changes to Social Security, AARP does recognize that “down the road” some adjustments, NOT “privatization”, will be needed to “balance the budgets”. Their stance is defensive, but not like the NRA’s; deplorable.


    Why DO so many in Congress fear the NRA? Why do they ignore the fact that the majority of those 70 million firearms owners SUPPORT stronger background checks, limits on magazine capacity, and sensible “regulation” as required by the Constitution?


    Also, with 4 million members, where does the NRA money actually come from to like well, pay Wayne La Pierre over $900,000 a year?


    The Second Amendment, like the First, needs to be analyzed with a view toward the body of the Constitution, that limits spending on an “army” to two years at a time to prevent a “standing army” of size (thus the need for WELL REGULATED militias under control of THE GOVERNMENT), or Article Six that clearly states religion is NOT a part of our government, period.

  3. Justice22

    Justice22 said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    I agree. I was a member of the NRA for about 15 years and was sorry to give it up as the NRA began telling me how to vote. I gavve my accunulated collection of American Rifleman magazines to a friend, also a gun owner, who unfortunately chose to take his own life with one of his guns. I miss you Gene.

  4. mdavis4183

    mdavis4183 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    None of Obama’s moronic ideas would have prevented Newtown, Aurora, Virginia Tech, etc..

  5. Surveyingsam

    Surveyingsam GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    AARP give me a break!

  6. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @MortyForTyrant

    Don’t count your chickens before the hatch

  7. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    Yet you are against the NRA fighting so you can keep your right to keep your guns.

  8. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    ,, The Right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Why do you ignore this?

    Why do you own guns if you hate them?

  9. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Tigger: you wil obviously never understand it. I own guns to hunt, and have used them to kill people. I don’t choose to do that again. A gun is a tool, I’m proficient with them, and know when NOT to use them, and while I own them, I don’t worship them, or have foolish weapons that substitute for genetallia for so many “gun nuts”.


    Having faced many “dangerous” situations as a younger man, I now find that a firearm might make up for that lack of speed and agility that once served well.


    Would I kill someone to protect lives? Yes, if the last resort. Law such as “stand your ground”, as Zimmerman practiced in Florida, have no place in a civillzed society. He tracked a man down and murdered him, period. THAT is the kind of “law” the NRA supports, that I cannot.


    And once again you refuse to read the Constitution. Scalia among others has also pointed out, from the view of SCOTUS that “well-regulated” DOES trump that b.s. of “shall not be infringed”.


    If any organization in the last 20 years has truly threatened my “right” to keep and bear arms, it HAS BEEN the NRA, with their idiotic stands, especially regarding SMALL “concealable” firearms, ignoring their supposed protection of “hunters, sportsmen” and those wanting to keep rifles and shotguns. They are the NO RATIONAL ALTERNATIVE organization and it is that recalcitrance that DOES cause lawmakers to seek “overkill” in trying to reduce the killing.

  10. Bears

    Bears GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    I stand with dtroutma as a long time gun owner (40yrs) who had to leave the NRA when it became an agenda factory. I have met many gun owners who are careful, reasonable people who I have trusted and respected on hunting and shooting range trips. I have also met many who I would NEVER trust around me with a loaded weapon

  11. Michyle Glen

    Michyle Glen said, about 1 year ago

    To bad some GOP Senators have not been shot at, that might Adjust their attitude toward background checks.

  12. Michyle Glen

    Michyle Glen said, about 1 year ago

    @Bears

    Agreed, Owning a Weapon is a responsibility and a privilage.

  13. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    The math intrigues me. If there are “only” 70M owners, but there are over 250M weapons, that means that every owner has nearly four weapons. Since a lot of owners only have one (Colt in the nightstand) that means a lot of people need to have more than four. FOR WHAT? A hunter needs three guns: a rifle, a shotgun and a handgun (mercy-shot). Okay, some are collectors. But it still doesn’t add up. Expect more Waco (Branch Davidian, sp?) stuff in the future…

  14. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    ^Target pistol, 22. Small carry, .38. Serious damage (a gift) .45. Shotguns: 20 gauge for small birds and game, 12 gauge for geese and larger “edibles”. Rifles: 22-250 for antelope and “long range”, 30-30 model 94 “brush gun” and for elk. 22 rifle for target (it was my mom’s!) another .22 for varmints in agricultural fields (rimfire ammo is a LOT cheaper than center fire). A “collector” 1892 Mauser Argentine (another gift) in 7.65, no scope but it CAN “reach out and touch someone” a LONG way off, and that includes coyote etc..


    Yes, quite a few people, even those wanting regulations to increase and improve “public safety”, own more than four guns. BUT, what I do find scary is the folks I know in NRA, some with over 200 guns, mostly semi-automatic, and neurotically “collected”, to “defend themselves from the government”!!


    I live in a rural area (always have chosen to most of my life) and guns ARE common around here as TOOLS! What I find “interesting” is the city dweller with over 50 firearms at hand, in semi-auto no less. What are THEY “hunting”?? Or, why so much “defense”? Well, the latter does go along with our NATIONAL “defense strategy”

  15. Michyle Glen

    Michyle Glen said, about 1 year ago

    Looks like gun control is going to be a State by State decision. That might be a good thing.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (5).