“No trump” is preferable. What a joke. Our pathetic president thinks he can solve Middle Eastern conflict with his brand of know-nothing bluster. Good luck to that.
It is interesting that, early in his first term, Obama tried to have a balanced approach to the Islamic terror cancer and was prematurely awarded the Nobel Peace prize for it. Notice there’s nothing even vaguely like that coming out of Stockholm for our pathetic little “leader.” Obama knew that KSA citizens are the largest supporters of Sunni terrorism—including 9/11. That’s why the Saudis were always wary of his efforts to bring peace. Instead, President Obama recognized that while the Saudi regime enforces its anti-terror efforts vigorously at home it looks the other way for the money that flows from Saudis to the madrasses in Pakistan and the terrorists in Europe.
It is also true that Obama upset the Israeli right wing by trying to be more even-handed. Of course, he also upset the Iranian right wing by pushing (along with our allies) for the landmark nuclear deal, where opponents had no alternative path except outright war.
We shall see. I will be the first to praise a breakthrough by our Dear Leader—but that probability seems smaller than me getting killed by a terrorist while residing here in the US. I mean it’s possible—but the odds are massively against it. The US has little sympathy in the region since it was the Bushes who kicked over the hornets nest in Iraq in the first place, destabilizing the region. Then Obama, with less disastrous, but still negative consequences, continued to drone (with so-called “collateral damage” to non-combatants). It may have been the best worst option in his mind, but the region is stilla steaming pile of crap we’ve helped create.
Pathetic little trumpy’s narcissism is so pronounced he may actually think the regional conflicts that the US has inflamed for decades will yield to his speechwriter’s soaring rhetoric. Ok. Hope it works.
“No trump” is preferable. What a joke. Our pathetic president thinks he can solve Middle Eastern conflict with his brand of know-nothing bluster. Good luck to that.
It is interesting that, early in his first term, Obama tried to have a balanced approach to the Islamic terror cancer and was prematurely awarded the Nobel Peace prize for it. Notice there’s nothing even vaguely like that coming out of Stockholm for our pathetic little “leader.” Obama knew that KSA citizens are the largest supporters of Sunni terrorism—including 9/11. That’s why the Saudis were always wary of his efforts to bring peace. Instead, President Obama recognized that while the Saudi regime enforces its anti-terror efforts vigorously at home it looks the other way for the money that flows from Saudis to the madrasses in Pakistan and the terrorists in Europe.
It is also true that Obama upset the Israeli right wing by trying to be more even-handed. Of course, he also upset the Iranian right wing by pushing (along with our allies) for the landmark nuclear deal, where opponents had no alternative path except outright war.
We shall see. I will be the first to praise a breakthrough by our Dear Leader—but that probability seems smaller than me getting killed by a terrorist while residing here in the US. I mean it’s possible—but the odds are massively against it. The US has little sympathy in the region since it was the Bushes who kicked over the hornets nest in Iraq in the first place, destabilizing the region. Then Obama, with less disastrous, but still negative consequences, continued to drone (with so-called “collateral damage” to non-combatants). It may have been the best worst option in his mind, but the region is stilla steaming pile of crap we’ve helped create.
Pathetic little trumpy’s narcissism is so pronounced he may actually think the regional conflicts that the US has inflamed for decades will yield to his speechwriter’s soaring rhetoric. Ok. Hope it works.
Not bloody likely.