Steve Kelley by Steve Kelley

Steve Kelley


Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic GoComics PRO Member said, 9 months ago

    Nice transference there stevenson. The Democrats have a history of fighting for ALL Americans whereas the republicans have a long and storied history of only caring for the wealthy, powerful and privileged. The republicans also have a demonstrated disregard for women and women’s individual rights whereas Democrats fight for those individual rights, for all people, not just certain segments of society.

    And when it comes to cheating or “preying on women” the Democrats are no saints but they certainly aren’t on par with the Grand Old Philanderers who win that title hands down. And to top off their scandalous affair sundae the cherry on top is their continual pious claims of being the party of “Family Values” and “religiosity.” Hypocrisy is more like it. So please get your facts straight before you prove yourself the fool we currently only think you are.

    As for “nice cartoon Steve,” if could be, if there were any truth to it. But the republicans have no achievements of any importance to talk about, so they make something up.

  2. Jeff Kiser

    Jeff Kiser GoComics PRO Member said, 9 months ago

    In sexual harassment, and denigration of women, democrats make the republicans look like rank amateurs.

  3. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, 9 months ago

    That’s 2 for the Dems and how many for the RePubs?

  4. ARodney

    ARodney said, 9 months ago

    The ACTUAL difference between liberals and conservatives on this issues is that Weiner was thrown out of office and now has lost all support for his mayoral race, Filner has lost all support, and Spitzer resigned. On the conservative side, John Ensign stayed in office until forced out for financial corruption, David Vitter is still in office, and Mr. Appalachian Trail was elected back into the house. More to the point, the war on women continues apace where it matters, in law and policy. If you want to keep your fantasy that “democrats make republicans look like rank amateurs,” don’t do the math, don’t look at any actual data, as you will only upset yourself.

  5. Jeff H

    Jeff H said, 9 months ago

    Cartoonist must be a Spitzer fan.

  6. D PB

    D PB said, 9 months ago

    Neither side has the market cornered on sexual scandal, and if you look at some of the information out there, the Republicans appear to have a slight lead.

    Wikipedia on Federal level political sexual scandals

    There’s links there to other pages for additional information for state and local scandals. Of course, how much actually goes unreported and do we never hear about?

    I think the best part of this cartoon is the focus of the “war on women.” The hypocrisy is amazing.

  7. Fourcrows

    Fourcrows said, 9 months ago

    If you’re voting for values, you’ll be hard pressed to find a candidate on either side. Stop voting Republican and Democrat and giving these idiots a job. With only two parties, people tend to vote against a candidate as much a voting for their candidate. Throw a few more parties into the mix with equal funding, and the competition will force each party to only put forth the best candidate, not just the one with the money.

  8. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon said, 9 months ago

    The Republican embrace of the religious right agenda is fact. But as usual, S. Kelley looks for the irrelevance of Democrat-only pervs like Filner and Weiner. Liars and charlatans like them stand on their own demerits as liars and charlatans – and it crosses party boundaries.

  9. ReasonsVentriloquist

    ReasonsVentriloquist said, 9 months ago


    Yeah… Yesterday Sinclair Broadcasting announced that it was buying 7 Allbritton Stations NYT article about cited
    The megarich have been trying for years to get Term Limits and third parties going. Why? Because that way they can have an endless stream of “The Next” guy(gal) just waiting in line for their turn to do the mega rich’s bidding.
    Your idea may have been a workable idea before there were Billionaires. It’s not anymore.

  10. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C and Martens Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C and Martens Release said, 9 months ago

    Being a pervert is one thing. Writing legislation to control what happens inside a woman’s body is another. Both are wrong.

  11. echoraven

    echoraven said, 9 months ago


    You forgot Clinton with the credible allegations of rape and he got a bit “thumbs up”.

  12. Fourcrows

    Fourcrows said, 9 months ago


    We already have 2 parties doing the biddings of the megarich. Do you honestly believe that Democrats and Republicans are not being controlled by corporations and billionaires? Adding more parties will create a buyers market not for the rich, but for the people as well. Yes the megarich will still buy candidates, but now they will have to divide up themselves instead of only having to worry about 2 sides of the political spectrum. Right now it is too easy for them. Let’s make them work for their control.

  13. Fourcrows

    Fourcrows said, 9 months ago

    RV -
    Let me tell you why I supported Angus King for senate.
    During the campaign, both the Democrats and Republicans ran ads against him, not each other. The Democrats said he was to far right and pro business, and the Republicans said he was too far left and anti business. That’s how I knew he was the right choice – the billionaires on both sides put their efforts into defeating him because they weren’t sure who would control him. It didn’t work – he won the senate seat. Now I’m still hearing the same from both sides, which means he must be doing a good job.

  14. ReasonsVentriloquist

    ReasonsVentriloquist said, 9 months ago


    Sorry, I forgot that I had commented here.
    I’m in the middle of a few things, but I’ll get back here asap.

  15. ReasonsVentriloquist

    ReasonsVentriloquist said, 9 months ago


    Your second post puts the lie to the first one. They are the same (in the first post) and then they are different (in the second post). I’m not going to argue against this logical quandary because I use it too.
    And I don’t disagree with your intention. But I think that the solution you offer is based on facts that haven’t been in play for decades now.
    The original call was for their to be campaign finance reform such that there were no (or limited) fundraising. OK cool, except that if you owned the newspapers and the television stations and the radio stations in a given market, then the candidate that your company supported would tend to get the pretty picture published, and the opponent will always get the derisive picture as they slip on the banana peel being the picture that makes the front pages.
    The “candidate” is someone who has long been “employed” by those powers that be. It’s not that XYZ corp is paying for his ads, it’s that the candidate has been groomed by XYZ to be “the Candidate” for a number of years.
    Campaign Finance Reform" is a sort of bone that can be thrown to the howling masses if and when they get organized enough to demand it. But it is still just a meatless bone.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (2).