Steve Breen by Steve Breen

Steve Breen

Comments (8) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. boreas2

    boreas2 said, about 2 years ago


    i have no idea what you mean by the rosie part

    do you mean the woman who called to tell the cop version and who said she was his friend on the same call ?

    because if you claim she said she was there then you are lying

  2. Tax Man

    Tax Man said, about 2 years ago

    This administration consistently makes decisions without facts. ISIL is a minor inconvenience. Iraq is now a wonderful place so we can pull ALL troops out. The Russians are not a problem.

  3. Baleine

    Baleine said, about 2 years ago

    This is a fine idea and its too bad it has nothing to do with how this will play out. Any criminal trial for the cop will come down to his point of view on that day. Armed, unarmed, suspect in a robbery, or totally innocent will have no impact. Just the phrase “I felt threatened”. This jury will have no option but to send him home.
    Justice will only come if the culture that created this situation changes. A court, a conviction does not have the power to make such a change.

  4. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Over 400 police related “Homicides” a year in the U.S.. How many get coverage? How many are related to police taking down truly, really, “bad guys” trying to kill them or others?

    There are bad cops, and agencies, like Ferguson’s appears to be, but the vast majority do a good job. But! I still am repelled by the increased “militarization” of law enforcement in the U.S., 99.9% driven by the “War on Drugs”, and the “War on Terror”.

  5. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago


    Seeing as how the officer didn’t know the unarmed person he shot multiple times was a robbery suspect, the fact that he was a robbery suspect will most likely be inadmissible in court. It all comes down to how much force was he justified to used based on the information he had at the time of the shooting.

    Based on the video showing the officer’s behavior after the shooting and the number of shots fired, I’d guess the officer panicked and just started shooting. In the video he exhibits the behavior of someone who realized he royally f—ked up and is trying to think of what to do next.

    Do I think the shooting was intentional? Absolutely not. Do I think deadly force was justified? No, not if non-lethal force such as pepper spray or stun guns were available to him.

  6. Pharmakeus Ubik

    Pharmakeus Ubik said, about 2 years ago

    What? Via spirit medium?

  7. TJDestry

    TJDestry GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Note that the finger is on the scale’s right-hand pan. He must mean the Supreme Court.

  8. strohbaj

    strohbaj said, about 2 years ago

    Every time Sharpton speaks, one can safely assume that the truth is on the other side. Just because he is BLACK LOUDMOUTH, how many Mulligans is he getting?

  9. Refresh Comments.