Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Customize Homepage
Daily Comics Email
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
Two-time Pulitzer Prize-winner Steve Breen is fast developing a reputation for provocative political cartoons that have captured the attention of some of the nation's premier publications. His cartoons regularly appear in The New York Times, USA Today, Newsweek and US News and World Report. His comic strip, Grand Avenue, appears in more than 150 newspapers across the country.
© Steve Breen - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2013. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Comments (13) (Please sign in to comment)
dtroutma
said, 8 months ago
I didn’t see the “real” either of them show up for the whole thing. Mitt heaped on the junk food, and yes, Obama was “out to lunch”… strange event, but not a “debate”.
Machado
said, 8 months ago
LOL, the best debate ’toon up to now ..LOL
I think it was the climate change created by Denver’s altitude, or so Gore says, and we all know he’s an expert, Right? LOL
Megan said, 8 months ago
Not so broken when he comes out swinging the next morning.
Ms. Ima said, 8 months ago
Did O do a lot of uhhhhhhh uhhhhhhh uhhhhhhh?
MortyForTyrant said, 8 months ago
At least with Obama you don’t see nuts and bolds in this situation…
sw10mm said, 8 months ago
He needed a teleprompter, o was on valium, the altitude, it was a trap, doesn’t watch enough msnbc, o wants to lose, mitt cheated, it was lehrers fault, o is lazy, it wasn’t the real mitt.
.
These are only 10 of the lame excuses for his pitiful performance.
.
Over 50 uh’s to answer your question, lma.
churchillwasright said, 8 months ago
@sw10mm
SW10mm: This video puts the count at 236!! Warning: Painful To Watch
kamwick
said, 8 months ago
As Carville said, “Obama came expecting to have a conversation, while Romney came out with a chainsaw.” Also, it’s hard to debate someone who’s changed his stance five minutes before. Fact checkers have been having a field day with Mitt.
Dredpiraterobt$ said, 8 months ago
Churchill makes a link! God on you church. Now I’ll take the time to follow it.
Dredpiraterobt$ said, 8 months ago
@Dredpiraterobt$ I went, I saw… So what?
.
How is Romney going to pay for his tax cuts? How is he going to pay for an extra $200,000,000 per year in Pentagon (Spent ‘n Gone) funding?
.
Which deductions is he going to cut? What happens to those of us who use those deducions (like salesmen who deduct mileage? and Hotel stays, and flights and meals and entertainment, and trade journals, and postage and phones and on and on and on?) He’s going to cap deductions at $17,000? Higher for wealthy people?
.
Uhhhhh…. That’s the answer that Republicans give to that question.
.
Count those Uhhhs…
churchillwasright said, 8 months ago
DREDPIRATE: First of all, I’ve been using HTML and links on here for years.
Second of all, here,
here,
here and here.
Dredpiraterobt$ said, 7 months ago
@churchillwasright
reuters.com/article/-taxes-:
.
So Mitt has been running for president for how many years/ And he figures that he’ll let congress decide?
.
Further, I’ve showed the fallacy of the “Revenue Neutral”ity of Mitt’s plan with the $17,000 cap on deductions, several times now.
.
taxfoundation.org/blog/more-how-pay-romneys-tax-cuts (second link)
.
The Tax Foundation is funded by private donations from members, corporate donations, and donations from charitable foundation such as the Koch Foundation, Earhart Foundation, etc.
.
Board of Directors
On its website the Tax Foundation lists its board of directors, as of March 2009, as being:3
Dr. Wayne Gable (Chairman), Koch Charitable Foundations
.
Info from Source Watch
.
NEXT!
.
“The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same.” (In re: weeklystandard.com/blogs/princeton-economist-obama-campaign-misrepresenting-my-study-romneys-tax-plan Link 3)
.
It’s axiomatic If it is “Revenue Neutral” and the people making more than $200,000 pay the same that they are today, then the rise has to come from those below $200,000.
.
As to the Asbury Park Press link: If Romney eliminates the Estate tax alone, the savings for the very wealthy will be in the trillions of dollars over the next 10 years.
.
But, of course the Asbury Park Press doesn’t want to mention THAT!
.
Four sources four wiffs. How many will it take for you to understand that you are the stuckee in Mitt’s “plans”?
churchillwasright said, 7 months ago
^ SRD. (Selective Reading Disorder)