Steve Benson by Steve Benson

Steve Benson

Comments (18) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Move over Pete Rose, a new whipping boy is in the sports world.

  2. buddhahardee

    buddhahardee said, over 2 years ago

    HE passed all the tests.

  3. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    “HE passed all the tests.”

    As had been said before, there are methods that don’t show up on drug tests yet.

  4. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 2 years ago

    Found guilty by rumor and innuendo.

  5. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 2 years ago


    Which means that there is no evidence that Mr. Amrstrong has done anything wrong. There is only the fact that he defeated all challengers and passed every drug test required. But the judges in their opinion think that is enough to cast doubt on his honesty. Guilty until proven innocent.

  6. uh-oh

    uh-oh GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Relevant to what?

    If it’s not important, at least make me laugh.

    Wasn’t he tested when he last got on the podium in France a couple of years ago? That was quite a feat for coming out of retirement.

  7. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    His best friend, George Hincape also turned him in, and was Lance’s lead rider many times over the years. George is very highly respected, and is American, not French. I was rooting for Lance too!

  8. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Kept thinking of all the “supplements” all athletes consume, that are “natural”, and okay. Opium, pot, and coca are also “natural”, and some “legit” things can match “performance enhancement”. Blood transfusions of course aren’t “natural”, but neither is riding the Tour de France for so many years.

  9. Justice22

    Justice22 said, over 2 years ago

    When I use performance enhancing drugs, I always have a big audience to witness it. - - —*
    This is saying Lance is a stupid idiot.

  10. petergrt

    petergrt said, over 2 years ago

    Last time Lance won the Tour d’F was in 2005 – 7-years ago.
    Isn’t there a statute of limitation, or is ‘doping’ as bad or worse then murder?
    That said, it is highly doubtful that he would have given-up were it not for some solid evidence . . . .
    Regardless, to have accomplished what he did with or without the aid of some ‘stuff’ was an amazing achievement, and is therefore not likely to tarnish his ‘persona’ power much.

  11. yusodum

    yusodum said, over 2 years ago

    Yes, there is a statue of limitation. It’s 8 years. There was really no reason why he couldn’t have kept 5 of his victories.

  12. yusodum

    yusodum said, over 2 years ago

    statute, sorry.

    When reading these comments, I really get the impression that most posters have not been watching the Tour over the years.

    What was happening was that the stage times slowly and quietly were reduced from 8 hours to 6 hours while the bikers looked stronger and stronger.

    Then suddenly they upped the testing, and the stage times returned back to 8 hours.

    Enter Lance, and suddenly he’s doing all the stages in 6 hours and winning. However, he is still passing all his drug tests.

    Then he retires, and his team appoints his old lieutenant, Floyd Landis as team captain. He does abysmally. Suddenly Lance flies in to be moral coach for the team. Landis then has a press conference in which he states something like “a man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do”. He then gets some excellent times, wins the tour, and gets busted for doping.

    So, yes, we have really only been sitting waiting for when they would bust Lance Armstrong. Sorry, but it really was that obvious.

    Oh, and disqualifying Lance favours German riders, not French ones.

  13. omQ R

    omQ R said, over 2 years ago

    I’m riding to Paris from London in a couple weeks and, as part of my preparation, I have been training with the more experienced cyclists coming along who do this distance in an average week. Of course I’ve been chatting to them about this, mentioning my scepticism and giving Armstrong the benefit of the doubt. To a man, they all do not believe Armstrong. Like yusodum above, this hasn’t been a surprise to them.

  14. mdavis4183

    mdavis4183 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    ZSERO proof exists to support the ban. We get the point – the regulating agency is run by TURDS.

  15. Heavy B

    Heavy B said, over 2 years ago

    If armstrong is so innocent, then why did he give up? The man is banned for life from compeating in the tour and he was striped of his seven titles. If it were me, I would have fought tooth and nail, even if it were for ping pong trophies. Why would he think its better to lose his awards, have his record tarnished, and be considered a laughing stock, if hes CLEAN?

  16. Load the rest of the comments (3).