Signe Wilkinson by Signe Wilkinson

Signe Wilkinson

Comments (24) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, about 3 years ago

    Funny stuff!

  2. ARodney

    ARodney said, about 3 years ago

    Oddly enough, they’re running ahead of their opposition. Their willingness to attack the powers that be apparently are more important than their failures as private individuals.

  3. AshburnStadium

    AshburnStadium said, about 3 years ago

    What they can kiss is a body part whose vulgar name is a synonym for a donkey.

  4. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 3 years ago

    The thing is these to losers are winning.

  5. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, about 3 years ago

    I still would’ve laughed. I don’t agree with most of her toons, but I do appreciate the fact that she is willing to mix it up politically and not take everything too seriously.

  6. TJ

    TJ said, about 3 years ago

    People generally get the type of government they deserve.

  7. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, about 3 years ago

    I don’t think it’s the baby she should be worrying about.

  8. Comic Minister

    Comic Minister said, about 3 years ago

    Nice running lady!

  9. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 3 years ago

    @TJ

    Oh my God you’re scarring me, because what we deserve at the moment is a bunch of guys in congress with the dumbs, oh wait to late. Sorry.

  10. Mr. Ngn33r

    Mr. Ngn33r GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    Mark Sanford showed the way…these ethically bankrupt souls are just following the wishes of the people.

  11. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    Yes, everyone knows that Democrats never have children. Keen observation, Gresch.

  12. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    The baby is lucky to have been born to Democrats, rather than to Republicans who lose all interest in babies after they’re born.

  13. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    You don’t even know the nationality of Obama’s father??? How could you have missed that? It was the major story for years on your only news source.

  14. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    “… lost interest …according to you that would make him a Republican”

    Gresch, Gresch, Gresch. Nowhere did I say that anyone who loses interest in the welfare of children is a Republican. You’re either not reading carefully, or you missed out on the most basic logic. “All apples are fruits” does not mean “all fruits are apples”.

    But I’m glad you’ve now learned more about Obama’s father.

  15. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    “I asked a question”

    Ah, I thought it was a rhetorical question, but I forgot who I’m dealing with. To answer it, if I had meant Obama’s father was a Republican, then I would have said Obama’s father was a Republican. Since I neither said nor inferred any such thing, we now know that it was nothing more than you once again claiming I said something I never did, just like you kept doing in the July 5 Joel Pett thread.

    And I have to laugh at you demanding all your questions be answered, given the number you ran away from in that thread. And I shake my head sadly at the fact that you still seem to think that “Republicans who lose all interest in babies after they’re born” is the same as “anyone who loses interest in their own child must therefore be a Republican”. Pity you never did a report on basic logical relationships.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (9).