Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly

Shoe

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ORMouseworks

    ORMouseworks said, over 2 years ago

    Yes…we’re at liberty to have debt… ;)

  2. Alexikakos
  3. Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper)

    Jo Clear (aka: Grasshopper) GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Yep Senator, I’ve had a lot of that, debt. that is….

  4. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, over 2 years ago

    ‘Give me liberty or give me death!’
    Bang.
    ‘Let me rephrase that.’
    (Laugh In skit. I feel old being able to remember that.)

  5. jim gamer

    jim gamer said, over 2 years ago

    8^( !!!!

  6. puddleglum1066

    puddleglum1066 said, over 2 years ago

    Well, if I look at actual historic facts, I find that the big increases in deficit and detbt came during the regime of St. Reagan (let’s cut taxes for the wealthy and spend more money) and the Bush dynasty (let’s cut taxes further and launch a few wars on credit). The Clinton years saw a shrinking deficit, leading to an actual surplus the last year, and predictions that if things were not changed (which, of course, they were by Dubya) we’d zero out the national debt by 2010. Obama inherited a collapsed economy and a huge deficit, which he’s been steadily reducing.


    But don’t let any of these facts get in the way of your Faux Snooze talking points…

  7. westny77

    westny77 said, over 2 years ago

    So sloshed he probable can’t stand…

    Nice touch. I guess the ding a ling has to say something even if it is dopey.

  8. Ross Stanton

    Ross Stanton said, over 2 years ago

    Right in the center so as to not fall off the sides.

  9. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, over 2 years ago

    If he chooses debt, he’s a liberal.

  10. Chris Maple

    Chris Maple said, over 2 years ago

    @puddleglum1066

    It takes money to repair damage. Reagan had to rebuild the military that Carter had gutted. Reagan’s numbers are also damaged by the inflationary overhang of Carter’s spending, which meant that each $14 three years into Reagan’s administration was equivalent to $10 of Carter’s.

    The 2008 economic collapse was due entirely to Democrat home loan policies that Bush’s attempts to repeal were thwarted.

    As for Obama reducing the deficit, you are relying on people not distinguishing deficit from debt. Bush’s last year included his fantastically ignorant bailout schemes, which were meant to be a one-time thing. Tyrant Obama may be reducing the deficit from that last year’s level, but the total debt is still floating into the stratosphere. It is easy to end the deficit immediately: don’t spend money today. Tomorrow, next day, etc.: do the same thing.

  11. Charles

    Charles said, over 2 years ago

    And the difference is…?

  12. HectorGonzalez

    HectorGonzalez said, over 2 years ago

    You guys talk as though it was real money. Open your eyes to MMT.

  13. Refresh Comments.