Comments (28) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Linguist said, 3 months ago

   A nutshell and a nut case !
2. 

   The Nihilist said, 3 months ago

   @Linguist

   …from Nutberg; and they keep voting the nut-job back in, again and again
3. 

   win said, 3 months ago

   I know nuting…
4. 

   Bruno Zeigerts said, 3 months ago

   @win

   I see nuting … I hear nuting …
5. 

   Radish said, 3 months ago

   So how come the Republicans didn’t filibuster the sequester?
6. 

   win said, 3 months ago

   @Bruno Zeigerts

   “Be a good fellow and take me with you.” – Sgt. Schultz
7. 

   SUSAN NEWMAN said, 3 months ago

   Phil E. Buster?
   Isn’t he from the 10th district??
8. 

   Mneedle said, 3 months ago

   @Radish

   Because it is already law. You must be a dem.
9. 

   Josh Lyons said, 3 months ago

   Filibustering is what they’re going to do after March 1st.
10. 

    Dale Netherton said, 3 months ago

    Filiblustering is more like it.
11. 

    nazzofoggenmach said, 3 months ago

    my favorite is still “vote yes on no”!
12. 

    Omnius said, 3 months ago

    A shame Harry Reid was too much of a coward to change the filibuster rules.
13. 

    Guard SGT said, 3 months ago

    @Radish

    The Sequester was the Usurper’s idea. He was for it and now he is against it.
14. 

    Guard SGT said, 3 months ago

    @Omnius

    Lazy Dirty Harry has been filibustering against doing a budget for 1,400+ days now. If he changed the rules, he might just have to do a budget! Then he would have to do some work.
15. 

    whmIII said, 3 months ago

    Fire them ALL!!!
16. Load the rest of the comments (13).