Comments (12) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   Dutchboy1 said, 7 months ago

   Sure would be nice for a change. Unfortunately, it doesn’t look very likely any time soon.

2. 

   prider said, 7 months ago

   Join the club!

3. 

   farren said, 7 months ago

   What? You’re waiting for someone to slap you with a fish? The change over the last three months hasn’t been earth-shaking, but it’s definitely there. Start with one simple fact: the Holder Justice Department dropped the prosecution of Ted Stevens, a prosecution which was started by the Bush administration. If that’s not more attention to ethics, I don’t know what is.

4. 

   prasrinivara said, 7 months ago

   Touché, Cosmo!

5. 

   Dry said, 7 months ago

   There is none!

6. 

   TiggerLeBounce said, 7 months ago

   Well, there is the ethics of convenience. But somehow I don’t think that counts.

7. 

   whmIII said, 7 months ago

   The words “ethics” and “government” do not belong in the same sentence!

8. 

   Northwoodser said, 7 months ago

   Who’s ethics and who’s government?

9. 

   pookid54 said, 7 months ago

   Ethical Government….Oxymoron

10. 

    Silverpearl said, 7 months ago

    Northwoodser - do you mean whose ethics and whose government? We are supposed to have government of, by, and for the people. There are a lot of people out there who would do the same thing if they had the chance.

11. 

    Dribbler46 said, 7 months ago

    I think its a little off color, with apology’s to William Tidler Jr.

12. 

    channce said, 7 months ago

    “Dribbler46 says:

    I think its a little off color, with apology’s to William Tidler Jr. ”

    Good one Dribbler46