Rob Rogers by Rob Rogers

Rob Rogers

Comments (24) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, 4 months ago

    Ashes, ashes, all fall down. They keep lighting a match to Benghazi, and want us to forget “shock and awe” and it’s aftermath, like all the lies that were proven to be lies.

  2. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, 4 months ago

    The Senate majority found the administration innocent as new born babes; the minority found the administration guilty as sin. Strict democracy makes the administration innocent; jury rules would call it a hung jury.


    Those of us with the right ideas know this administration (including the previous Secretary of State) is clearly guilty, and we don’t need no stinkin’ proof or evidence to convince us.

  3. Armitage72

    Armitage72 said, 4 months ago

    It sometimes seems as though half of the GOP are Pokemon named “Benghazi”, since that’s the only thing they can say, over and over.

  4. mextea

    mextea said, 4 months ago

    no…smells like a rat with four dead bodies.

  5. magicwalnut

    magicwalnut GoComics PRO Member said, 4 months ago

    “Those of us with the right ideas know this administration (including the previous Secretary of State) is clearly guilty, and we don’t need no stinkin’ proof or evidence to convince us.”

    That about says it all for the right…to heck with proof….

  6. CasualBrowser

    CasualBrowser GoComics PRO Member said, 4 months ago

    Benghazi is apparently the only thing about President Obama that matters these days over on Fox News

  7. mikefive

    mikefive said, 4 months ago

    It is appalling to me that the only place some seem to get their information is from blatantly political sources. From the get go, the State Department knew that the Benghazi facility would come under attack at some time in the near future and many seem to be willing to sweep State incompetence and negligence under the rug. From the Senate Intelligence Committee Report: “FINDING #2: The State Department should have increased its security posture more significantly in Benghazi based on the deteriorating security situation on the ground and IC threat reporting on the prior attacks against Westerners in Benghazi including two incidents at the Temporary Mission Facility on April 6 and June 6, 2012.” The committee based this on: DIA, “Libya: Terrorists Now Targeting U.S. and Western Interests,” Defense Intelligence Report, June 12, 2012, Joint Staff, “Terrorism: Conditions Ripe for More Attacks, Terrorist Safe Haven in Libya,” J-2 Intelligence
    Update, June 18,2012, DIA “███, etc. (I really dislike redacted)”Defense Intelligence Digest, July 2, 2012.

    There was a litany of historical attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities posted recently to defend the administration. These only underscored the needed increase in security in Benghazi in the face of a clear, present, and demonstrated danger there.

  8. jeff cartwright

    jeff cartwright GoComics PRO Member said, 4 months ago

    first with Clinton it was just sex now with barry it is a witch hunt good grief take some responsibility

  9. markjoseph125

    markjoseph125 GoComics PRO Member said, 4 months ago

    Not surprising; they certainly don’t want decent people to focus on their platform.

  10. DLee4144

    DLee4144 GoComics PRO Member said, 4 months ago

    The demographics are all trending toward the Democrats. New voters register as Democrats twice as often as they do as Republicans ( though more than half register as independents). But, in general, they are relatively liberal.There have been previous situations where one party was the subject of “The Party’s Over” books. But they were able to come back by appealing to demographics that the other party didn’t have in their pocket. The only people that aren’t solidly in agreement with Democratic positions are far left wingers and far right wingers. There aren’t enough far right wingers to win a national election. The Republicans can’t make their tent big enough to include the far left wingers without the people already in the tent setting it on fire. It’s pretty hard to imagine a situation where any of the available Republicans can beat any of 5-8 possible Democratic candidates, and most incumbents are reelected. That means we are most likely going to have a Democratic president through 2024, by which time a huge number of those angry old white guys that are now the bulk of the Republican base are going to be dead.The upshot is that there is a darn good chance that we will never again have a Republican president.

  11. foofinho

    foofinho said, 4 months ago

    @DLee4144

    Hopefully we can have a president by 2024 that can actually move the country forward and not burden it with debt.

  12. mikefive

    mikefive said, 4 months ago

    @Truist

    “Then we have the House Austerity Plan that recuced (sic) the State Dept funding from $1.81 billion to $1.53 billion and the months it took them to reconcile that budget with the knowledge of those threats.”

    I know Elijah Cummings, Barbara Boxer, and Joe Biden have said this and it was immediately picked up by the blogosphere, but (isn’t there always?) In testimony Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security and directly responsible, was asked “Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?” Her reply was “No, sir.” This woman’s butt was on the line when she testified and I will believe her rather than the politicians.

    In defense of the President, it would be astounding if the President knew about the Benghazi facility’s inadequate security. That would be carrying micro-management a bit far. Those that blame the President directly are edging into the absurd.

  13. mextea

    mextea said, 4 months ago

    to all the lib/progressive/commies commenting here…if YOUR son had been killed in Benghazi…you would be continuing to talk about it until you KNEW you had the truth…and
    I noticed you talking about war…(which was voted for by democrats too)…and the problem with Clinton was not just sex…it was lying about it…just like Nixon’s problem was less about the break-in…and more about the cover-up…. .

  14. Kip W

    Kip W said, 4 months ago

    60 embassy deaths under Bush, no problem.
    4 under Obama, and suddenly we care about human life.
    Especially Issa, who shows his care by voting to cut funding for security at embassies, even after Benghazi. I guess he wants more talking points to waste money investigating.

  15. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, 4 months ago

    @Kip W

    Another relatively amazing thing to me at least, is that Issa’s congressional district is smack dab in the middle of the state of California! You know, the state most hated by the ultra conservatives here and elsewhere as a bastion of the hated “liberals”. A full load of irony!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (9).