Rob Rogers by Rob Rogers

Rob Rogers

Comments (35) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, almost 3 years ago

    Once again it’s Robbie paying the race card to the lowest of low-information voters.
    You get paid for this garbage?

  2. Radish

    Radish GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    Truth hurts some people.

  3. Stipple

    Stipple said, almost 3 years ago

    @ConserveGov

    Race is one point out of seven, eight if you count the pope.
    Why is it always the only thing you ever see?

  4. iangoodson

    iangoodson said, almost 3 years ago

    The pope is not in favour of more inclusion. He has recently excommunicated a priest in favour, amongst other things, of same-sex marriage. He has asked for a more charitable approach to opponents and for the Roman Church to stop rattling on about it and do what it it is supposed to do. This is being twisted by the media as is seen above.

  5. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    @Stipple

    Race is one point out of seven, eight if you count the pope.

    Lord knows, liberals hate nothing more than those smug, superior Argentines. ;^)

  6. Mick Hardy

    Mick Hardy said, almost 3 years ago

    Are you Nancy Pelosi’s brother!??

  7. Reppr

    Reppr said, almost 3 years ago

    9. Cartoonists!

  8. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, almost 3 years ago

    @ConserveGov

    It would appear that “Christian Values” only have worth if it enables the extremists among the conservatives to focus on the items listed in the cartoon instead of jobs, infrastructure repair/improvement (as brought up by CEOs in recent gatherings in NY), election reform, repairing the ACA, etc, etc.
    It is tempting to respond directly to your specific complaint, but in deference to a conservative who has told me bringing up the racial conflicts in our nation is not productive, I’ll resist. However, I do wonder why you choose that one issue out of the eight the cartoon raises.
    A recent discussion amongst the talking heads asked a pertinent question – why is it class warfare if liberals talk about subsidies and tax breaks for the rich, but talking about the “greedy poor” is just addressing important issues facing the country?
    It has the scent of hypocrisy, and such scents, whether raised by liberals or conservatives, are not good. The more extreme the position, the worse the scent.
    ConGov, please answer me one question…
    Do you believe that Ronald Reagan would be able to be elected to ANY Republican office under the current RNC administration?
    Respectfully,
    C.

  9. Enoki

    Enoki said, almost 3 years ago

    The Progressive Left’s is shorter: Everybody but themselves.

  10. ARodney

    ARodney said, almost 3 years ago

    Of course the other side is filled with anger and hatred. There’s no other way to explain the fact-free rage against science, economics, and basic truth. Robert Reich, who has been right about the damaging economics of trickle-down for twenty years or more, had a nice article on this in yesterdays’ NYT. Someone called him a Communist dirtbag, because he’d heard Bill O’Reilly say it. Of course, Reich has never been a Communist, but it’s easier to hate Communists, and that’s good enough.

  11. Enoki

    Enoki said, almost 3 years ago

    I made my observation on the Left that I posted based on reading their books (like ones by George Lakoff or TIm Wise for example), reading their magazines like The Nation, and listening to their talking heads on the radio like Ed Schultz or Randi Rhodes.
    My observations are based on actual findings and results, what was your comment based on?

  12. jtripp47

    jtripp47 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    You never fail to make me laugh!

  13. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, almost 3 years ago

    @Respectful Troll

    “Do you believe that Ronald Reagan would be able to be elected to ANY Republican office under the current RNC administration?”————————
    Yes. Reagan would inspire optimism, not divisiveness and statements like 8% unemployment is just the new normal.
    He also would unite people behind the good of the country, not ramming through hurried, monstrous bills without reading them like the ACA.
    Reagan would tell people that the government is the LAST thing people should become dependent on.
    He would also return America to its position as the leader of the free world.
    Also, instead of divisive rhetoric that fractures a country, he would bring people back together like he did with Reagan Democrats.
    We would return to being “The shining city on a hill” as Reagan called it and a renewed sense of pride.
    As he said during his farewell speech:
    Finally, there is a great tradition of warnings in presidential farewells, and I’ve got one that’s been on my mind for some time. But oddly enough it starts with one of the things I’m proudest of in the past eight years: the resurgence of national pride that I called the new patriotism. This national feeling is good, but it won’t count for much, and it won’t last unless it’s grounded in thoughtfulness and knowledge".
    So yes RT, Reagan would be nominated and elected in a heartbeat.

  14. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, almost 3 years ago

    “Why not? You get paid for spewing your garbage”.
    Really? Wow, I can’t wait for my first check!

  15. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, almost 3 years ago

    @Respectful Troll

    And btw, this toon is the complete opposite of what Reagan espoused.
    Saying Republicans consider all women, Latinos, Blacks, and the poor as being the “enemy” is extremely divisive (and childish) but sadly a popular thing to do these days.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (20).