Rob Rogers by Rob Rogers

Rob Rogers

Comments (26) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 2 years ago

    You should at least be able to read what you are voting for.
    Not sure what that has to do with skin color, Robbie?

  2. durrdurr

    durrdurr said, over 2 years ago

    The ones that are happy ( black or white ) are the ones that are sitting on their backsides with their hand stuck out, laughing at the poor working slobs who are feeding them.

  3. ODon

    ODon said, over 2 years ago

    I assure you it’s not remotely near “all americans”

  4. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Scalia wants to suppress black votes because they vote democratic. Scalia’s true concern is less about “racial entitlement” than it is about making sure his fellow Republicans are entitled. Entitled, that is, to manipulate elections when they can no longer win fair and square.

  5. Rockngolfer

    Rockngolfer said, over 2 years ago

    @Rad-ish

    You hit the nail on the head.

  6. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, over 2 years ago

    I heard that Mitch McConnell is going to change his name to Mitcho McConnellez.

  7. lonecat

    lonecat said, over 2 years ago

    What does “racial entitlement” mean? In general and particularly concerning voting rights? What exactly is the problem?

  8. Ajax 4Hire

    Ajax 4Hire said, over 2 years ago

    Seriously?
    A black man has obtained the highest office in the land.
    There are black men and women mayors of major cities now covered by the VRA.

    Remember the 14th Amendment: “…equal protection under the law.”

    It is now time to decide.
    Do I want and get special treatment due to race?
    OR
    Do I move forward, stand on my own and step out of the shadow of protectionism. If I clinging to the Voting Rights Act I will never be allowed “equal protection under the law.”

    As long as there is protectionism, quotas, set-asides and the VRA, then someone will always be suspicion that I did not make it on merit alone, I got special treatment.

  9. lonecat

    lonecat said, over 2 years ago

    @Ajax 4Hire

    Special treatment to vote? That I don’t understand.

  10. lonecat

    lonecat said, over 2 years ago

    That would guarantee the demise of the Republican party.

  11. rickf1968

    rickf1968 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @lonecat

    on the contrary it would be the demise of the Dem party.. idg it

  12. Rockngolfer

    Rockngolfer said, over 2 years ago

    Impediments to registration, photo ID laws, shortened hours of voting, fewer places to vote, etc. Many tactics declared unconstituional by lower court judges. And you know what, Obama was reelected anyway.

  13. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @Rockngolfer

    Maybe I should have mentioned I was quoting David Horsey.

  14. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @Ajax 4Hire

    Are you a paid troll?
    Scalia’s opinion was based on very scanty evidence.

  15. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    It indeed is NOT just about “race” with the “tests” dreamed up, and it is a national issue, not just a few states or precincts. Of course, if folks had to answer say 5 questions from the naturalization test to vote, allowed to miss one, 90% of TEA party folks wouldn’t be voting, and right-wing “conservatives” and “dittoheads” wouldn’t even need to waste the gas to show up. I love it when Rush touts his Constitution course, apparently conducted by folks like himself, who’ve never read it, but only accepted their own “interpretation”.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (11).