Rob Rogers is the award-winning editorial cartoonist for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. His cartoons have been vexing and entertaining readers in Pittsburgh since 1984. Syndicated by United Feature Syndicate, Rogers’ work also appears in The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today and Newsweek, among others.
Rogers has also been the curator of three national cartoon exhibitions, Too Hot to Handle: Creating Controversy through Political Cartoons (2003) and Drawn To The Summit: A G-20 Exhibition Of Political Cartoons (2009), both at The Andy Warhol Museum, and Bush Leaguers: Cartoonists Take on the White House (2007) at the American University Museum. Rogers is an active member (and past president) of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists. His work received the 2000 Thomas Nast Award from the Overseas Press Club, the 1995 National Headliner Award, and numerous Golden Quills. In 1999 he was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize.
In 2009, Rogers celebrated 25 years as a Pittsburgh editorial cartoonist with the release of his book, No Cartoon Left Behind: The Best of Rob Rogers, published by Carnegie Mellon University Press.
He is currently serving as board president of the ToonSeum, a cartoon museum in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - All Rights Reserved.
Marshall Ramsey by Marshall Ramsey
Steve Sack by Steve Sack
Comments (31) (Please sign in to comment)
JAMES MCWILLIAMS
said, 11 months ago
Right on the money……pun intended.
braindead08 said, 11 months ago
Brought to you by Scalia and other Supremes who are not the slightest bit activist.
zoidknight said, 11 months ago
@braindead08
Encouraged by liberals and democrats.
Ms. Ima said, 11 months ago
Obama’s favorite song: Take the money and run.
TheTrustedMechanic said, 11 months ago
But money is speech don’t ya know? So millionaires have more rights to speak than you or I. Of course, some brainless ramblers (Ima & Zoid) should be rendered mute with their hands bound. I’m all for free speach, even if it disagrees with me, but stupidity and lies are where I draw the line.
walruscarver2000 said, 11 months ago
Are we really at the point where we can be sold anything as long as it is advertised enuff?
Harleyquinn
said, 11 months ago
Obama is just mad, last time around he was able to spend more money then the other guy. His slick mindless advertisement worked. But nobody is chanting hope change now. Obama is out fund raising at a pace to triple what bush did. Obama needs money to pay for the pizza and donuts! http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/303902/how-obama-campaign-spends-its-money
Harleyquinn
said, 11 months ago
At least Mitt is not asking for wedding presents. http://www.metro.us/newyork/national/article/1146435—obama-asks-couples-to-forgo-wedding-gifts-donate-to-his-campaign-instead
But that all right Obama has the lame stream media and the hollywood crowd to be faces for him. And we all know that is something money can not buy. Lame steam repeating everything Obama send out. Empty Hollywood elites to pretend to be political geniuses, they know how to sell nothing! So why is Obama and liberals so afraid of Mitt getting more money then them? Is not their message the most holly according to them?
DrCanuck said, 11 months ago
@zoidknight
So Bush-appointed conservative judges opened the door to more money in politics and it’s all the fault of Obama and the Democrats?
Oh, you GOTTA explain THAT reasoning to the Canadian.
pirate227 said, 11 months ago
Since money is free speech and corporations are people, corporations have more free speech than you. That makes sense, right?
Radish
said, 11 months ago
Just give voter a bunch of drugs so he can sleep walk his way thru life like the majority.
Ms. Ima said, 11 months ago
@TheTrustedMechanic
Typical liberal wanting to kill ideas that are foreign to them.
Ms. Ima said, 11 months ago
@DrCanuck
Can’t figure out American politics, eh? That’s ok because no one can figure out Canadian politics either.
Eryx
said, 11 months ago
@Ms. Ima
It’s called a Parliamentary system. Look it up.
TheTrustedMechanic said, 11 months ago
@Ms. Ima
I understand the idea just fine. The powerful and elite have the all the money. Money is power. The Supreme Circus claims that money is speech, which is clearly is NOT. So that makes those with more money, more powerful than most of us. It also makes them have more freedom of speech since they can speak louder and to a much larger group than most people. You and your ilk complain if the (in)justices don’t decide based upon VERY narrow and specific “originalist” interpretations of the Constitution. But the decision that money is speech can NEVER be defended as in line with original intent. But that’s to be overlooked by the redumblicans because it largely benefit the redumblicans.