By the way, you are for the total governmental subjugation of “the American public” by a tyrannical form of government that seeks to control every aspect of our lives. I am for a mode of government that protects our freedoms and liberties, not dictates my thoughts and actions. I am not for one section of “class” against the other, like you obviously are. I am for the liberty of citizenship in a country that identifies the inherent rights of individual citizens, which allows people to become a Steve Jobs, or a Thomas Edison, or a Nicola Tesla, or a Michael Jackson, or a Barack Obama (a man who tells people that they can’t make it in the world, in spite of the fact that HE has).You, on the other hand, are for the reigns of power to be in the hands of an oligarchy, for them to decide upon what your future will be, and for them to mold and move you to create a Utopia based upon a model that THEY’VE dreamed of. You are for people to be mindless puppets in the hands of those who hold all the power, with no rights other than what the government “grants” them. What essentially is the difference between the way you wish government to be and how Stalin, Hitler, or Mao ruled over their subjects? One of Obama’s favorite people is Bill Ayers, and he’s totally for “reeducating” and “eliminating” people in order to force them to be the collective. Is there ANY limit to where you believe government cannot act, and if so, how do you propose that it can be stopped. As it stands in your head, there should be no end to what government can do for or TO anyone.