Comments (26) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Ez2foome said, 1 day ago

   Dude, go back on the Appalachian trail.
2. 

   Mneedle said, 1 day ago

   @Ez2foome

   But is his personal life. Wasn’t that the line when Clinton was doing Monica?
3. 

   californicated1 said, 1 day ago

   Cue the Tammy Wynette music—
   …
   “Stand by your man…”
4. 

   TheTrustedMechanic said, 1 day ago

   This was a prime example of the hypocrisy of the party of “family values.” Morals, values and the sanctity of marriage only matter when they are dictating them to you, but don’t expect the repubbies to live by their standards for you.
5. 

   Clark Kent said, 1 day ago

   He’s a (ugh) republican. How did Nancy Pelosi help him?
   BTW, who’s the woman in gray? His mistress? His wife?
6. 

   rightisright said, 1 day ago

   Sanford’s only “sin” was not having the last name Clinton. The left shouldn’t be judging anyone from their sewer.
7. 

   David said, 1 day ago

   @Clark Kent

   Nearly his entire campaign was focused around the fact that Mrs. Pelosi (D) supported Colbert-Busch (D). Apparently, that was more important than Sanford’s abandonment of his family and govenorship to run away with his mistress in Argentina.
8. 

   Omnius said, 1 day ago

   Thanks for confirming that the majority of voters in South Carolina’s first district have no family or moral values whatsoever!
9. 

   ghostkeeper said, 1 day ago

   A while back I prophesied he’d get in. Hey, South Carolina, it’s a ‘right to slavery’ state (I refuse to use their term ‘right to work’) and was the first state in the Union to secede, so of course Sanford would get in! South Carolina, where the state motto should be slavery is freedom stupidity is wisdom poverty is wealth. And yes, there I go again, participating in the prejudice and stereotypes of the Southern states. For which I should feel shame, but give me a break! They elect Sanford, and then expect the stereotype not to be reinforced? Dudes, Dudettes, at least slow down the confirmations of the stereotypes!
10. 

    neuturn said, 1 day ago

    I am not sure, but this could be one of those “Better of the two evils” kind of win. Maybe he did a good job while he was in office and like with Clinton they decided they could let the infidelity and lies go.
11. 

    1opinion said, 1 day ago

    I have read several places he won on name recognition.
12. 

    motivemagus said, 1 day ago

    Un-effing-believable. A pathological liar and narcissist representing SC. Look for his presidential run, coming soon…
13. 

    motivemagus said, 1 day ago

    @neuturn

    Nope, not really. He abandoned his post to canoodle with his mistress. Period. Even his second-in-command didn’t know where he was. That is technically illegal and certainly incompetent.
14. 

    ansonia said, 1 day ago

    @TheTrustedMechanic

    So where do you stand on Anthony Weiner running for mayor of NY ?
15. 

    Stipple said, 1 day ago

    @ghostkeeper

    I started taking exception to this prejudicial post of yours. Not PC what you are saying.
    .
    Then the “but” sank in….

    They elected Sanford! How can it possibly be expected the “inbred imbecile” stereotype won’t be considered proven?
    .
    I feel sorry for all the decent intelligent citizens of SC, they should have voted.
16. Load the rest of the comments (11).