Member since November 25, 2011
This user has no shared collections.
View More Collections
Why don't you go browse some
and pick a few to favorite?
commented on Ben Sargent
about 2 years ago
Sadly, no. But you do have the honor of being the reason I’ve been here at all!
“That may be the wave of the future, along with its inherent unforseen consequences”I hope so, but are the inherent consequences really unforseen? I can’t help but think you’ve already forseen them…otherwise, how do you know there are any? Do enlighten me.
“but so far election results have indicated no such thing.”Give it time. The number of people who support gay marriage will keep increasing. Or who knows? Maybe before that some activist justices will legalize it, just like they did with inter-racial marriage…bet that really made your blood boil, huh?
“Spoken like a true liberal, living and dying by polls”Ah, yes, you’ve already told us that “ALL people” are lucky to have you to speak for them, so you certainly don’t want to let polls get in your way of your baseless strawmen.“Society does not want gay marriage to be recognized…”Gee, how can I refute that? Oh, wait, I don’t have to, because you refuted it yourself in your very next paragraph when you agreed that “around half of Americans are in favor of gay marriage, and that number is going to keep rising in favor of the gays as the older generation is replaced”. Nice job.
RiR, I asked you “Why not respond to what I say instead of your own creations?”, and your answer was “How much credibility do you think you deserve with a wacky handle and troll Arab for an avatar?”. Couldn’t answer the question, could you? And then in the very same post you did exactly the same thing again. Why do you even both posting if all you’re going to do is argue against your own baseless strawman arguments?
“However that wasn’t my point.”Your point was “Until I get my legal hookers and weed, gays will have to make due with civil unions.” I have shown you both are legal, so by your rules gays no longer have to “make due with civil unions”.
commented on Tom Toles
about 2 years ago
Gresch, this shouldn’t be this difficult. We are assured by many, including you, that “traditional” marriage means only one man married to one woman. I have shown you that there are many other historical definitions of marriage. Adding “gay marriage” to the list would make millions of people happy, and have no ill effects on anyone else (except those that hate gays and want to hurt them).
Going off on tangents to avoid having to answer pointed questions seems to be a bit of a modus operandi for Gresch.
There are enough pre-existing definitions of marriage in history (and in the bible) that one more won’t matter. And since adding “gay marriage” would make millions of people happy, and have no ill effects on everyone else (except those that hate gays and want to hurt them), then I see no reason to not allow it.“Hate” may not be a big feature of Christianity, but it is certainly a feature of many Christians…so my use of the phrase “gay-hating christians” stands.
Copyright © 2014. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved.