A Recent Favorite:

Uh Oh, Nothing Here Yet

Why don't you go browse some Comics or Editorials and pick a few to favorite?

Recent Comments

  1. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury 10 days ago

    Roddy Albany, another good porno stage name.

  2. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury about 1 month ago

    And don’t call me Shirley.

  3. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury about 1 month ago

    I don’t get it. In order to do an apples-to-apples comparison, the FDA either assigned a dollar value to the pleasure of smoking, or assigned an emotional value to the cost dollars. Neither would be valid. What am I missing?

  4. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury about 1 month ago

    Well said, green. I, too, took acid several (30?) times back in yore, and I had many revelations and made many important decisions while tripping. All – yes, all – have been proven right, at least for me. Perhaps I would have arrived at them without the tripping, but we’ll never know that, will we?

  5. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury about 1 month ago

    I tended bar in discotheques for ten years back in yore. If you think it’s bad now, wait until you’re in your mid-sixties.

  6. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury 2 months ago

    “I hope I did not cross a line…”

    Not at all. But we MUST continue development on that sarcasm font.

  7. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury 2 months ago

    More than disappointing, terrifying to some. I suspect that’s the underlying cause of much of the generalized angst in America today.

  8. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury 2 months ago

    Or as Paul Newman said in Harper, he must be one of those physics.

  9. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury 3 months ago

    And as to Bush making the best decision he could with the information available, both he and many in his administration were looking for a pretext to invade Iraq well before 9/11. Immediately after the attacks, Rumsfeld started talking about attacking Iraq even though there was absolutely no data linking Iraq to the attacks. Can you be intellectually honest enough to agree that indicates a predisposition to attack on the part of the administration? For that matter, Iran is a lot closer to having the bomb than Iraq ever was. Are you advocating invasion there?

  10. DoctorDan GoComics Pro Member commented on Doonesbury 3 months ago

    I agree that Hitler could have been easily defeated in 37, if any nation had the will to do so. But again, Saddam having the bomb at some uncertain future date is not the same as him having the ability to conquer the world. Or do you think they’re the same?