A Recent Favorite:

Uh Oh, Nothing Here Yet

Why don't you go browse some Comics or Editorials and pick a few to favorite?

Recent Comments

  1. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury 3 days ago

    It means that the conversation is back where it started, nothing finished or even advanced.
    Or it means nothing at all, just Trudeau catching your attention,

  2. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury 7 days ago

    Well said! Thank you for your clear summary.

  3. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury 10 days ago

    Some people look for the cloud’s silver lining; others, for the silver lining’s cloud.

  4. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury 15 days ago

    But voter fraud has not been a problem. It was invented to allow “protection” against fraud by requiring ID of those for whom it would be a problem.

  5. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury about 1 month ago

    With the Bush family and the Clinton family, succession is the problem: a perceived belief on their part that they should be a ruling family. With Texas it’s a secession problem:it sees itself as independent of the rest of the US and perhaps would make many happy by leaving.

  6. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury about 1 month ago

    It’s always a good idea to take a trusted person with you to a medical visit if you have a known condition with the possibility of news. One can easily be distracted and tuned into predicting the future with some bad or just unexpected report and miss significant elements; your companion is much more likely to remain attentive. A friend told me she didn’t do the post-op procedures she was instructed in because the anesthetic had left her loopy and forgetful. She took a taxi home alone and went to sleep. The physical consequences were not severe but could have been avoided.

  7. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury 2 months ago

    Zonker has a particular facility with words which didn’t translate into good grades.

  8. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury 3 months ago

    “Here we presuppose the rich are all heartless, uncaring monsters. We have no proof, only our prejudices and counter examples like Bill and Melinda Gates (rare though they may be).” You forgot Buffet, the other exception. Three people must be a very small percentage of the one percent. And you appear to be personally an argument for the rest being heartless and uncaring monsters; you dismiss the hungry children as mistakes made by their impoverished parents, not human beings sharing your world.

  9. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury 3 months ago

    And “you know perfectly well” that some of the one per cent can comfortably watch children of the ninety-nine per cent go hungry because their parents cannot find work.

  10. marzipANn commented on Doonesbury 3 months ago

    That’s true, but plants don’t interrupt when you’re making your point either. That’s an advantage shared with this forum.